Skip to comments.
EUPHEMISMS FOR EUPHEMISMS AT THE TIMES
The Conspiracy to Keep You Poor and Stupid ^
| July 30, 2003
| Donald L. Luskin
Posted on 07/30/2003 9:15:37 PM PDT by Timesink
EUPHEMISMS FOR EUPHEMISMS AT THE TIMESNew executive editor Bill Keller is at the helm of the New York Times now. Already there's progress, but it's progress West 43rd Street style -- all designed to preserve the dignity of the Gray Lady.
Today the Times announced Keller will appoint a "public editor" to "serve as a representative for readers." They've often said they'd never never appoint an "ombudsman" like the Washington Post. And, indeed, they have not appointed an ombudsman. They've appointed a "public editor."
And today's report of the Times' "Siegal Committee" -- appointed to look into the causes and aftermath of the Jayson Blair scandal -- denied that Blair was a product of the Times' affirmative action program. Keller said, "That charge, they make clear, is wrong." Yet a comment by the committee's outside members noted that Blair's rapid advancement "has all the earmarks of a social promotion." Indeed, it was not affirmative action. It was "social promotion."
Must they use euphemisms for euphemisms? After all the Times has been through, wouldn't it just be easier to be honest?
Posted by Donald Luskin at 11:18 PM
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billkeller; falsification; howellraines; jaysonblair; mediafraud; medialies; newyorktimes; nyt; ombudsman; plagiarism; schadenfreude; siegalcommittee; thenewyorktimes
posted on 07/30/2003 9:15:38 PM PDT
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
posted on 07/30/2003 9:16:45 PM PDT
Must they use euphemisms for euphemisms?
Surely Donald jests, for how else is progress bought?
Without using e's for e's, we would still be saying poor house
for dole; dole for welfare; welfare for public assistance..
How does he think this all gets started? The NYT is breaking
posted on 07/30/2003 9:40:31 PM PDT
It's worse than that... hard to believe I know, but the NYT has long called "liberal activists" by the title of "journalists".
posted on 07/30/2003 9:44:48 PM PDT
(Peace is the prerogative of the victorious, not the vanquished.... Churchill)
posted on 08/06/2003 11:20:50 PM PDT
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson