[At _War_With_Liberals]

The point is not whether the man had his faults, but rather the fact that he nailed alot of communists spot on.

His attackers knew he was nailing communists rightly and attacked him viciously, denying each and every assertion he made. They were protecting anti US leftists who were in high positions via conspiracy. They then changed history to cover up.

'McCarthy, without a shred of evidence, unleashed a vitriolic diatribe against the US Army'...Congress persecutes groups before hearings daily. So what?
The army needed to receive the message that they had better not tolerate subversives. He was censored by mostly democrats who wanted to shut him down for their own political reasons, not to defend the army.

As far as his acute alcoholism for years, this is simply impossible. An acute alcoholic could never function like he did. If he was wasted daily it would have been obvious and the story of the decade. It wasn't even the story of the week.

'My point here is that Ann's case would have been much better served had she not treaded into these murky -- and most dangerous -- waters.'...Communists and sympathisers were exerting influence all over society and government-then there was a coverup and rewriting of history regarding the evil McCarthy era. These are facts. The truth is finally exposed...and you are worried about him being aggressive? You are upset that Communists were exposed and the coverup is now evident?

Have you ever been a member of the Communist party?

[DPB101]

And hardly anyone remembers FDR admonishing the nation about the similarity between conservative Republicans and fascists in his 1944 State of the Union address.

The net knows:

Franklin Roosevelt's 11th State of the Union Message

" . . .We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all . . ."