Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I guess that Russians want to make sure they won't have another Chernobyl in Russian Far East. On the other hand, this could also be a media blitz to nudge N. Korea into 6-way talks.

AmericanInTokyo first commented on this story at (reply 14, reply 19.) Later, I came across it in a S. Korean site which refered to this article in hani.co.kr. So I decided to post it here after translating it.

1 posted on 08/01/2003 10:52:34 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; yonif; Amelia; knighthawk; Shermy; OahuBreeze
Ping!
2 posted on 08/01/2003 10:54:36 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Way to go Putin!
3 posted on 08/01/2003 10:56:10 AM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
If true, then this is quite interesting, and reminds me of the old joke that goes like this...

"You know what you have when you have a mothball in one hand and a mothball in the other hand? You have one moth's undivided attention!"

North Korea is now looking at the U.S. coming at them from one direction, and Russian missiles coming at them from another direction. I do believe we have one particular little moth's undivided attention.
4 posted on 08/01/2003 10:57:07 AM PDT by Elliott Jackalope (Formerly Billy_bob_bob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I hope Putin clears all this with the French, the Germans and Tom Dasshole.
6 posted on 08/01/2003 11:01:36 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Hey everybody! Nuke em if ya got em!
7 posted on 08/01/2003 11:04:56 AM PDT by scab4faa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
A strike based on a war breaking out is not a pre-emtive strike.
9 posted on 08/01/2003 11:06:46 AM PDT by VRWC_minion (Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Does Russia have the capability without going nuclear itself?
11 posted on 08/01/2003 11:08:01 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Think of a band of friendly thieves. On the surface, they get along to varying degrees. Underneath, they are trying to pickpocket one another.

This is how I view the relationship between the US, China, and Russia. We might not be at cold war anymore, be we are still undermining each other in subtle and not so subtle ways.

At the same time, we have to deal with rouge nations which present a threat to the interests of all three countries. We should be backing each other up, which appears to be the case. After all, none of the three countries wants to be struck with a nukes or nuke fallout from N Korea. A multi tiered plan assures all countries that one way or another, rouge states will be neutralized.

Think of it as a good old boys club: rouge states need not apply to the nuclear club.

13 posted on 08/01/2003 11:15:38 AM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Talk about something I thought was IMPOSSIBLE in my lifetime!

USA and Russia joining forces against nk???
19 posted on 08/01/2003 11:33:05 AM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Paul Ross; Orion78; Noswad
"Ooops. Sorry. We missed. Sorry about all those people in Seoul."

Seriously, the Russians LOVE the DPRK. Good cop bad cop. They would NOT nuke the DPRK. This smells of disinfo.
21 posted on 08/01/2003 11:36:46 AM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Bush's policy of not giving in to NK's demands is looking better and better and better. The dominos are falling into place, and they're not falling the way Kim wanted them to.
25 posted on 08/01/2003 11:38:20 AM PDT by Califelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I don't know how serious Russia is, but I'll bet we have a pre-emptive strike plan. North Korea is going to have to be dealt with very soon. Millions of people will die. The only question is, will Americans be among those dead? Not bloody likely!!
37 posted on 08/01/2003 11:54:26 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Stop the violins!! Visualize whirled peas...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
The 11,200 ton ship carries 64 S300 ship-to-air missiles and 16 P500 ship-to-ship missiles, which can be used to attack N. Korean missile bases.

Attacking land based targets with air defence and ship to ship missles? Interesting..... :)
39 posted on 08/01/2003 12:15:26 PM PDT by Daus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Rich irony.

The original source and propagating power behind communism, now repentant and reformed, destroys its own progeny and one time staunch ally.

47 posted on 08/01/2003 12:40:54 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Oh goody. I always wondered just how the thing was going to start.
57 posted on 08/01/2003 2:10:07 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I wouldn't count on the Russkies having the nerve to do it. Or their military being able to get the job done.
58 posted on 08/01/2003 2:21:35 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: DPB101
Ping
68 posted on 08/01/2003 6:54:58 PM PDT by Calpernia ('Typos Amnesty Day')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I love all this, but one should at least note that the Russians were sure against the U.S. taking pre-emptive action in Iraq when it was the U.S. that was being threatened by Islamic Jihad and other islamic terrorist.
70 posted on 08/01/2003 9:32:35 PM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I love the smell of radioactive Kimche in the morning...
83 posted on 08/02/2003 8:14:36 AM PDT by democrats_nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Russia will guarantee the security of North Korea (4/10/03)
87 posted on 08/02/2003 8:06:11 PM PDT by Orion78 (FREE IRAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson