To: bedolido
I've read several book on General Patton. I'm convinced the war would've been extended a year longer if he hadn't been in charge of the 3rd, and shortened by one year if Eisenhower would've given him the supplies he needed instead of giving that bafoon Montgomery the supplies to get our guys killed in the north (A Bridge Too Far).Just change out Patton at Third Army with Bradley at 12th Army Group and all the guys would've been home for Christmas. C'est la guerre!
Walt
9 posted on
08/01/2003 12:35:32 PM PDT by
WhiskeyPapa
(Virtue is the uncontested prize.)
To: WhiskeyPapa
Your #9...precisely correct!
Eisenhower had to starve Patton's tanks of fuel to slow him down enough to make the Russians and the Brits happy.
19 posted on
08/01/2003 1:00:05 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: WhiskeyPapa
Bradley was to cautious. You're correct in your assessment. Patton instinctively knew where to attack and how. That attribute has only been found a few times in war. The recent successful attack by the 3rd army in Iraq used Patton as a guide. Hit'um where they ain't.
22 posted on
08/01/2003 1:10:54 PM PDT by
bedolido
(Quitters Never Win! Winners Never Quit! But those who never win and never quit are idiots!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson