Posted on 08/01/2003 4:13:41 PM PDT by Brian S
DETROIT, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co. hopes to eliminate about 21,000 jobs or 20 percent of its blue-collar work force over the life of a new collective bargaining agreement with the United Auto Workers union, sources familiar with the company's plans said this week.
When it unveiled a multiyear turnaround plan to recover from a deepening financial crisis in January last year, the world's second largest automaker said it planned to cut about 12,000 hourly jobs, nearly all represented by the UAW.
But sources close to the company said it was now looking at shrinking even further its blue-collar ranks, which include workers at its former auto parts subsidiary Visteon Corp. . Ford hopes to cut roughly 5 percent a year over the duration of a four-year contract with the UAW.
The cuts would be achieved through attrition -- meaning that Ford would not replace workers as they quit or retire -- and the company's total blue-collar work force would be cut to around 73,000 employees from 94,000, the sources said.
Anne Marie Gattari, a Ford spokeswoman, declined to comment on the nature of any planned cutback, which could complicate the contract talks that Ford and other Detroit automakers opened with the UAW two weeks ago.
But Ford's plan would be bolstered by the fact that the company has a large number of factory workers who are at or near completing 30 years of service with the automaker, when they will be eligible for retirement.
At Ford's assembly plant in Lorain, Ohio, for example, almost one-third of the work force is eligible for retirement.
Though Ford's push to cut jobs through attrition could represent a major challenge for the UAW, which has been hurt by the loss of more than half its membership since 1979, it is not without precedent.
The union allowed General Motors Corp. to use attrition to scale back its work force repeatedly under contracts over the past decade, and more than 17,000 factory jobs were eliminated at GM alone under terms of the current UAW contract with little or no protest from the union's leadership.
The UAW negotiated one of the richest contracts in U.S. labor history in 1999, at a time when GM, Ford and the Chrysler arm of DaimlerChrysler were all coming off record profits.
But those profits have long since vanished, and many analysts and labor experts believe the UAW will endorse major cost-cutting efforts at Ford and its cross-town rivals as a trade-off for keeping generous health care and retirement benefits.
At Ford, in particular, company officials have said the UAW will have to lift a four-year ban on U.S. plant closings so it can proceed with its restructuring plan by eliminating excess production capacity.
They don't now, but they did for many years, until the Foundation's actions became too much of an embarrassment for the Ford Motor Company. The fact remains that the FMC allowed the FF to come into existence, and it is the FMC's fault the FF exists today. For that they will never be forgiven, unless they decide to create a new, equally well-funded foundation that supports only conservative causes.
Maybe they should try making vehicles that run reliably. I hear there is a market for that.
Didn't congress just pass exactly that? Some kind of pension guarantee of last resort?
That's a major understatement. Ask anyone who owned a Taurus under his (Jacques Nasser's) "management." The guy was a Green
http://www.corpwatch.org/news/PND.jsp?articleid=1453
who decided Taurus engines shouldn't have asbestos head gaskets. He replaced them with some horrible stuff that failed at about 60,000 miles and caused complete rod/valve-bending engine failure. It happened to my Taurus and my daughter's. Ford paid me nearly $4,000 after first saying they had no responsibility. They changed their tune when I got a lawyer. Multiply that by tens of thousands of other claims and you begin to see why they have problems. I might consider buying another Ford at some point but the company stonewalled and tried to screw people. They can't go bankrupt fast enough to suit me.
Thanks for the follow up...
Probably because his doesn't wear a $1000 suit, call himself an attorney and charge $500 an hour... ;)
They hope do they?
Wonder where those $$$ are going to be found. You have a 401K, IRA or a estate you intent to pass on to your kin? That is where the $$$ are at and they (the gov) will be coming for it, and sooner than you think.
There is no wonder that the "death tax" elimination provision recently enacted has a sunset clause allowing it to expire in 2010 (check that date but I'm close).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.