Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
I keep wondering what possible difference there could be between something that can interact with the physical and something that is physical.
15 posted on 08/02/2003 5:57:44 PM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
I keep wondering what possible difference there could be between something that can interact with the physical and something that is physical.

Because not to see the difference between them is to deny a fundamental truth of reality -- which is, the two terms never were equivalent in the first place. They describe two distinct, fundamental orders of being, whose mutual relation makes possible the universe in which we live and move and have our being.

Since the ancient Greeks, the two orders have been described as the "physical" and the "noetic" (from nous, mind, reason). To certain Greeks, mind was omnipresent in all aspects of universal nature.

I regard that as a classical cultural clue that it might be profitable for us humans to revisit and consider these days. Especially given the presently-prevailing objective condition of general cultural disorder and mayhem.

Can't say more now. Thanks so much for sharing your view, js1138.

19 posted on 08/02/2003 6:20:58 PM PDT by betty boop (We can have either human dignity or unfettered liberty, but not both. -- Dean Clancy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: js1138
I keep wondering what possible difference there could be between something that can interact with the physical and something that is physical.

The non-physical mind interacts with the physical brain....maybe.

56 posted on 08/03/2003 3:28:33 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson