Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Republican Wildcat
I agree. Impeach.

Wasn't this nation founded by a bunch of radically sensical people who didn't want to be ruled by a bunch of aloof foreign princes an ocean away? So why do our Courts decide absurdly that they are subservient to the European Courts?

Last I checked, the Constitution was designed to minimize the influence of foreign potentates on American justice. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, often labeled as a "moderate conservative," deserves to be impeached, convicted, and removed from office because she obviously has not read nor believed in the Constitution under which she supposedly ought to adjudicate the cases brought before her Court.

By gosh, if she's a "conservative," as the popular canards dictate, what the heck is a "liberal," besides a traitorous Communist in willful ignorance of any of the provisions of the Constitution who acts and adjudicates solely on the basis of emotion and defies reason?

In any case, isn't it racist to consider only European courts? Why not consider the standards of justice of the Chinese Communists, the Talibanic sharia courts, the decrees of genocidical terrorist military dictators, and other African, Asian, and Latin American countries?

And the American Constitution Society might need to investigate a document known to Americans as the Constitution!
45 posted on 08/03/2003 8:52:56 AM PDT by dufekin (Eliminate genocidical terrorist miltiary dictator Kim Jong Il now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: dufekin
I agree--although I don't know where you heard Ginsburg called a conservative. She's a Clinton appointee.
59 posted on 08/03/2003 11:08:08 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat (Help us elect Republicans in Kentucky! Click on my name for links to all the 2003 candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: dufekin; kattracks; Dan from Michigan
"Ruth Bader Ginsburg, ...deserves to be impeached, convicted, and removed from office because she obviously has not read nor believed in the Constitution under which she supposedly ought to adjudicate "

Rush was just talking about this. Obviously a direct violation of her oath to uphold US Constitutional law. SCOTUS judges are only there on "good behavior". IMPEACH AND REMOVE!!

112 posted on 08/05/2003 12:17:25 PM PDT by Xthe17th (FREE THE STATES. Repeal the 17th amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson