Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

kobe ACCUSER CRIED RAPE TO BELLHOP JUST AFTER INCIDENT
New York Post ^ | August 4, 2003 | Dan Mangan

Posted on 08/04/2003 9:56:34 AM PDT by Recourse

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:15:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
To: DaGman
I agree 100 percent; although in this case, we haven't heard much from Kobe's side, IMO. The ones doing the talking about HER were her "friends."

I can't remember when this all started -- this rush to print any and all "facts," aka DIRT, in cases like this; it was before we became familiar with the term "person of suspect," IMO.

For some reason the press thinks they NEED to have ALL the details before the first legal document is filed; Before long, no trial will be held in the county/city where it occurs.

That being said, I'm right in here with the rest of them, reading everything I can find on it. :-)
41 posted on 08/04/2003 10:49:04 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Neenah
This girl (accusor), if she hangs in, which is doubtful, has more moxie to me, than anyone in recent memory. They will chew her to pieces. Case in point...Paula Jones and those that followed her..and Wm. Kennedy Smith's accusor ! It is not going to be pretty. I would love to know the council she is getting. I have the feeling she will settle, or confess she made it up.

I don't know. I think this whole "courage" bit is being played up a bit too much. Yes, Paula Jones was trashed, but that was a concerted effort by a national political party. Kennedy-Smith's accuser? We don't even remember her name, so she's pretty much unharmed.

The alleged victim in this case will have the opportunity to move on, essentially anonymously, when this is over. She'll still be famous in Eagle County, I suppose, but there will be 300 million other people in this country that either won't know who she is or won't care.

How will they chew her to pieces? On the stand? It really is just a matter of sticks-and-stones, after all. She'll be called an unstable slut. Big surprise. If her family and the prosecution have any sense, they'll prepare her for that unseemly event, and she'll waltz through.

42 posted on 08/04/2003 10:50:10 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1smallVoice
I feel sorry for Kobie, imagine the first time you are unfaithful to your wife of only two years whom you adore to the tune of $8,000,000 that this happens. The first and only time. You have to feel sorry for this poor guy. No wonder he was crying, I would cry too, that was a really big ring.

Surely you jest.
43 posted on 08/04/2003 10:53:31 AM PDT by right wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
This will be a very different jury. The race card may not play well in Colorado.
44 posted on 08/04/2003 11:04:13 AM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Recourse
Well over two weeks ago I made a list of the evidence against Kobe. You would not believe the grief I got. It seems a lot of the items on my list turned out to be true after all. Still waiting for the other shoes to drop.

List
1. Hotel employees witness her behavior immediately following the event.

2. She had torn clothes (I further predicted that there would be a button that was torn from her clothing in the room, we shall see).

3. Her physical abuse was visible.

4. A witness heard a commonition in the room (this has yet to be proved).

5. Proof of forcible rape was returned from the crime lab.

6. She has taken a lie detector test and passed (this has yet to be proved).
45 posted on 08/04/2003 11:08:10 AM PDT by BushCountry (To the last, I will grapple with Democrats. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at Liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
Why do you keep listing things that have NOT been proved?
46 posted on 08/04/2003 11:13:34 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: right wing
Please don't call me Sherly.
47 posted on 08/04/2003 11:18:32 AM PDT by 1smallVoice (Clinton brought us Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Transcripts not up yet, but Fox story says sources told investigators.....so I think the Rita story should be sources told her that the bellhop said, etc. Besides the fact that if, as Rita claims, sources say the bellhop will be a key witness, he just violated the gag order if he related all of this to her.
48 posted on 08/04/2003 11:24:00 AM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #49 Removed by Moderator

To: LibFreeUSA
I only half heard something Drudge claimed on his show last night. It involved a video camera having captured something regarding Bryant on the hotel's premises. I didn't catch what the tape was about, but Drudge said that Bryant's attorneys were apoplectic and scrambling. Haven't seen or heard anything else about this, though.
50 posted on 08/04/2003 11:30:00 AM PDT by lonevoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Why do you keep listing things that have NOT been proved?

Because almost everything I said previously is coming true. Just give the rest some more time, you'll see. };O)

51 posted on 08/04/2003 12:15:10 PM PDT by BushCountry (To the last, I will grapple with Democrats. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at Liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Aren't you one of the ones decrying the supposed trashing of the accuser?

Yes, I am. But now we are talking about something germane to the case, not who she slept with six months ago or what she may or may not have said at a party days/weeks after the event. There's a difference between gossip and relevant facts.

BTW, if I were a judge, I wouldn't allow the "forced sex with Kobe Bryant" comment to be said in front of the jury (it's hearsay and it's prejudicial - it concludes guilt or innocense in its very utterance when the bellhop was not there to conclude if the statement was true or false). What's relevant is not what she said to the bellhop but what the bellhop can verify in terms of the state of the accused right after she left his room - the condition of her clothes, her emotional state, etc.

Bryant doesn't deny he had sex with her and it will be the physical evidence that will be critical in determining whether it was forced. What the bellhop does is narrow the timeline to refute claims that the woman faked her injuries or made up her story within the 12 hours between the event and going to the police.

It still doesn't prove the case but, if it stands, it eliminates some alternate theories the defense might otherwise use to claim that she "made it up" after the fact.

As for Rita naming the bellhop, don't you think most of these reporters already know the identities of every hotel staff working that night and have been trying to dig up information from them? These folks still have jobs and have to show up at the hotel so it would be pretty easy to find them, follow them and start peppering them with questions. Perhaps reporters have become much more lazy than in my day (sometimes it sure seems so) but I can't imagine a resourceful reporter not being able to find this out if they can get somebody to talk.

52 posted on 08/04/2003 12:15:30 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (http://righteverytime.blogspot.com - home to Tall_Texan's new column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: frmrda
"My sources tell me...."

One would THINK that someone at Fox would pull her aside and tell her that she sounds like a flaming horse's ass when she says that OVER AND OVER AND OVER. Get over yourself Rita. After that butchered report the nite of the Bush v. Gore decision, you'd think she'd wouldn't have such a high opinion of herself.

53 posted on 08/04/2003 1:06:11 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Yes, presuming he did it. He hasn't been convicted yet.

We, as a people, are so very fond of the courtroom, aren't we? A failure to convict does not mean that "R" bryant is innocent; it merely means that for whatever reason(s), the jury reported that the prosecution had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the elements of the applicable statute(s) had been violated.

So far as I am concerned, I'm convinced he raped the girl. My convictions need not be controlled by accepted courtroom procedure. Your mileage may vary.

54 posted on 08/04/2003 2:39:08 PM PDT by neutrino (Oderint dum metuant: Let them hate us, so long as they fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
And I keep thinking about what the female juror said after the jury she was on set OJ free. "All they had was a bloody glove and DNA evidence."

And I recall another OJ juror said: "What be so special 'bout DNA? Eberybody gots DNA. So what?"

55 posted on 08/04/2003 2:51:02 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TomB
After that butchered report the nite of the Bush v. Gore decision, you'd think she'd wouldn't have such a high opinion of herself.

Bingo. And that was sure a hell of a lot more important that Kobe Bryant!

56 posted on 08/04/2003 2:53:23 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: neutrino
My convictions need not be controlled by accepted courtroom procedure.

I hope the people of the state of Texas remember your feelings when you're arrested for something -- ANYTHING.

57 posted on 08/04/2003 2:55:09 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
"As for Rita naming the bellhop, don't you think most of these reporters already know the identities of every hotel staff working that night and have been trying to dig up information from them?"

I did not hear her name the bellhop. It is reasonable to assume the reporters, the DAs staff and the defense ALL have lists of every person that is involved (actually or potentially).

I read a couple of days ago that the defendant's team has Private Investigators, no doubt searching for anything they can find, which could prove useful to their case.

Be certain the defense will have developed a negative slant, for any witness which is favorable to the prosecution's case.



58 posted on 08/04/2003 3:01:13 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I don't buy it. If someone comes to me and says they've been raped I call the cops or at the least tell my manager, I don't drive them home.

You seem to be creating a grievous error here: you are applying sound logic to new, shocking, we-report-you-decide "facts in this case."

59 posted on 08/04/2003 3:10:13 PM PDT by Chief_Joe (From where the sun now sits, I will fight on -FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I hope the people of the state of Texas remember your feelings when you're arrested for something -- ANYTHING.

Now is that nice? Tut, tut.

60 posted on 08/04/2003 3:11:29 PM PDT by neutrino (Oderint dum metuant: Let them hate us, so long as they fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson