Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Need answer to legal question!
08/04/2003 | Trust but Verify

Posted on 08/04/2003 7:06:26 PM PDT by Trust but Verify

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: Trust but Verify
Generaly speaking (very generally), if the decedant died testate, leaving behind a will, all of his estate became subject to the probate laws of the State in which he resided. Power of attorney while he was living would not overrule the State probate laws.

Time to see a probate attorney for genuine advice.

41 posted on 08/04/2003 8:54:59 PM PDT by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
Try FindLaw.com -- they have most of the basic questions you may have listed, and can give you links to lawyers in your area.

Good luck.

42 posted on 08/04/2003 8:57:40 PM PDT by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeLawyer
Be very careful with that leverage. Threatening criminal prosecution unless someone cooperates in a civil matter (such as a probate) can be considered extortion.

What are the boundary lines. It would seem that there should be some degree of latitude to charge or not based upon a person's actions. After all, if a person bounces a check but makes good on it, that would not be considered a criminal offense, but bouncing a check and attempting to skate would be. If someone bounces a check, would it be untoward of the recipient to tell that person that they will press charges unless the check-writer makes good?

To my mind, the proper line should be restitution, including costs. Is there any legal definition for such things?

43 posted on 08/04/2003 9:04:39 PM PDT by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: supercat
What are the boundary lines.

It all depends upon the jurisdiction. I just don't want to see any Freepers cross any lines, so I'm giving a general warning. They should check with experienced counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.

44 posted on 08/04/2003 9:17:26 PM PDT by ConservativeLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
I expect the aunt is in some legal hot water. But I also worry about how a probate court is going to view a will prepared by someone who didn't think to mention to the executor that she'd appointed him as such. In a nasty family fight, this could provide grounds for a legal challenge to the deceased person's mental capacity at the time of preparing the will. And if there are any earlier wills lying around, the case could be tied up for years . . .
45 posted on 08/04/2003 9:19:13 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
But I also worry about how a probate court is going to view a will prepared by someone who didn't think to mention to the executor that she'd appointed him as such.

Perhaps the decedent trusted the aunt to relay the message, and the aunt somehow "forgot" but nonetheless claimed she had?

46 posted on 08/04/2003 9:21:30 PM PDT by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
The aunt used the POA to gain access to the bank accounts of grandma and distributed everything.

Most bank accounts are "frozen" at death, pending probate. The bank that allowed the aunt to access the account may have some culpability and liability in the draining of the accounts.

47 posted on 08/04/2003 11:15:09 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Tag line extermination service, no tagline too long or too short. Low prices. Freepmail me for quote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Trust but Verify
Can we get an update...????
48 posted on 08/06/2003 9:36:16 AM PDT by alisasny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny
Oh, it just keeps getting worse. The aunt is still claiming there is a second will she is going by but hasn't sent copies to anyone. We are not in that state and this is going to have to wait for clarification until we can make arrangements to get up there and talk to a lawyer. In the meantime, she is starting to bitch about things that have been distributed to the other two daughters that she now wants back. I think my poor husband is going to stroke out over the whole thing.

Check your FReepmail for an example of the insanity we're dealing with.

49 posted on 08/06/2003 10:16:05 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (Will work for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson