Posted on 08/05/2003 9:50:10 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:43:10 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Sacramento -- A second major Wall Street rating agency downgraded California's credit on Monday, but not as severely as the hit the state took two weeks ago.
Moody's dropped its rating on California's general obligation debt a single notch, from A2 to A3, keeping the rating in the uppermost tier. Standard & Poors downgraded California three notches on July 24, dropping it into the "B" category.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
I don't like that idea one bit.
Becki
calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register |
I really tire of this kind of ignorance. Californians pay some of the highest Federal income taxes in the nation. If the net outflow of revenue from California to the Federal Treasury was halted, and California was forced to "stand on its own," the State budget would be showing a surplus.
I really tire of this kind of ignorance. Californians pay some of the highest Federal income taxes in the nation. If the net outflow of revenue from California to the Federal Treasury was halted, and California was forced to "stand on its own," the State budget would be showing a surplus.
I really tire of this kind of ignorance. Californians pay some of the highest Federal income taxes in the nation. If the net outflow of revenue from California to the Federal Treasury was halted, and California was forced to "stand on its own," the State budget would be showing a surplus.
Are these the 16,000 "workers" who are shuffled into the phantom positions which the state government keeps open specifically for this bogus "lay off" contingency?
Uh, welcome to earth.
Would California then raise its own Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines, take back its federal prisoners, fund its own FBI and CIA, its own Food and Drug Administration, etc., etc., etc.?
EVERY state would show a "surplus" if it kept all the taxes its residents normally send to the feds but still got all the federal functions for "free".
Got it?
And what is the dollar value of the "benefit" California will receive from cheap Iraqi oil? (You can round to the nearest billion.) Take your time.
Please forgive my ignorance. It is not intentional.
But the article is talking about businesses leaving California, and taking their jobs with them. That means that the Federal Income Tax money, as and all other income tax, leave the state as well. Given that Federal rates are the same in California as in all other states, a reduction in the number of jobs in the state also means a reduction of the Federal taxes paid in by the state.
It also means that all other income taxes, state and local, as well as sales tax revenues will be reduced. If enough jobs leave the state, at some point the outflow will be less than the inflow. And at what point will the state be unable to fund current programs? That is what I was getting at.
If the net outflow of revenue from California to the Federal Treasury was halted, and California was forced to "stand on its own," the State budget would be showing a surplus.
Same here in Michigan. We pay out more than we get back in Federal money. But if enough jobs left here, we would be in the same trouble. At some point would the rest of the country start picking up the bill?
Becki
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.