Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major League Freep this Poll on Gay Marriage
CNN ^

Posted on 08/05/2003 12:37:34 PM PDT by Conservinator

QUICKVOTE

Should marriage be legally defined as only a union between a man and a woman?

Yes 306,434 No 605,753

VIEW RESULTS

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
CNN has posted a poll asking whether marriage should be reserved for heterosexuals (as President Bush has endorsed). WE ARE BEHIND 2 TO 1 AT THIS TIME!!!

FREEP FREEP FREEP!!!

1 posted on 08/05/2003 12:37:34 PM PDT by Conservinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
We?
2 posted on 08/05/2003 12:41:33 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
I'm FREEPIN!

34% 306832 votes
66% 605793 votes
3 posted on 08/05/2003 12:42:22 PM PDT by e5man_r_u? (A Man's mission: Build, Protect, Provide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
It's CNN...I wouldn't put tooooo much credibility into their polling results.....really....
4 posted on 08/05/2003 12:42:45 PM PDT by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
As seems to be typical of CNN's polls lately, I did view result before voting. Much to my lack of surprise, the yes count did not go up after I voted and refreshed.
5 posted on 08/05/2003 12:42:59 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
Trick question, at the national level? no. At the state level? Without a doubt
6 posted on 08/05/2003 12:44:47 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
There has to be something wrong with this poll. No other poll anywhere is anywhere near these results. In fact, EVERY POLL I've seen is almost 2-1 AGAINST homosexual marriage. I wouldn't be surprised if CNN hasn't deliberately reversed these results by mistake or design.
7 posted on 08/05/2003 12:44:57 PM PDT by laweeks (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: breakem
Yes, WE, as in heterosexuals, are behind in the voting. I say yes, marriage should be reserved for a man & woman . . . and the vast majority of people are like me, no matter what the liberal press wants to make us believe!!
8 posted on 08/05/2003 12:45:18 PM PDT by Conservinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
Should marriage be legally defined as only a union between a man and a woman?
Yes
  34%
307097 votes
No
  66%
605819 votes
Total: 912916 votes

9 posted on 08/05/2003 12:45:23 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
They don't even have a million viewers at this time of the day.

Someone is way padding this poll.
10 posted on 08/05/2003 12:46:43 PM PDT by exit82 (Constitution?--I got your Constitution right here!--T. Daschle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
We FReeped this all day yesterday and nothing changed!

Is it fixed by CNN? Probably!!

11 posted on 08/05/2003 12:46:56 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
Freep and Bump!
12 posted on 08/05/2003 12:47:09 PM PDT by mtbrandon49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator







13 posted on 08/05/2003 12:47:38 PM PDT by autoresponder (PETA TERRORISTS .wav file: BRUCE FRIEDRICH: http://tinyurl.com/hjhd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
The reason we're behind is because the perverts are out in force. Aside from that, who believes anything coming from CNN?
14 posted on 08/05/2003 12:47:39 PM PDT by Dixielander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
Not all heterosexuals, nor all freepers, oppose gay marriage. I thought you had started a club or something. Just wanted to know who you thought your were or if you suffered from multiple personality disorder.

My marriage is neither strengthened or threatened by homosexuals getting married. You might try to lower the divorce rate if you really care about marriage. WE heterosexuals have botched it up pretty badly.

15 posted on 08/05/2003 12:48:42 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
The Gay Jihad has hijacked the poll and are crashing it into the Twin Towers of Reason and Morality.

-Jay
16 posted on 08/05/2003 12:49:18 PM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Better a Bushbot than a Bubbabot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
Let CNN have this on their record. All the more ammo for not watching them.
17 posted on 08/05/2003 1:05:54 PM PDT by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks
Yeah, it's a fake poll -- preset to results CNN likes.
18 posted on 08/05/2003 1:37:22 PM PDT by demlosers (Come out of the shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
Hate to be picky, but 'marriage' already is legally defined as between a man and a woman. If you answer 'yes,' you will subconsciously be supporting the wrong notion that the courts or congress have the authority to RE-DEFINE a word that is already defined. Think about it. If you support that notion, you will have no position to complain if they re-define 'marriage' to include same-sex

Sorry, but the poll is phony, as is CNN. It's hiding the real issue, which is to trick you into supporting the notion that congress or the courts have the authority to re-define words that already have legal definitions. If the homos went the amendment route, they know they would fail. That is why they are mobbing congress and the courts to resolve the issue by adding a couple of words to the definition of the word, 'marriage.'

A new, or different word is need to define whatever it is that homos want to practice. To call it 'marriage' would destroy the meaning of the word, and the institution of holy matrimony which it has always represented.

And to re-define the word, 'marriage,' to mean one man and one woman would be redundant. That would be like renaming a Ford a Ford. Why fix a word if it isn't broken?

Tell CNN to take that piece of socialistic crap and stuff it back into that pile of propaganda dung they spawned it from.

19 posted on 08/05/2003 1:38:10 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservinator
FREEP..

Please all help me on this poll..

http://www.hdnews.net/

Thanks.
20 posted on 08/05/2003 1:56:57 PM PDT by FreeRep (Proud to be American: John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson