Skip to comments.
Major League Freep this Poll on Gay Marriage
CNN ^
Posted on 08/05/2003 12:37:34 PM PDT by Conservinator
QUICKVOTE
Should marriage be legally defined as only a union between a man and a woman?
Yes 306,434 No 605,753
VIEW RESULTS
(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
CNN has posted a poll asking whether marriage should be reserved for heterosexuals (as President Bush has endorsed). WE ARE BEHIND 2 TO 1 AT THIS TIME!!!
FREEP FREEP FREEP!!!
To: Conservinator
We?
2
posted on
08/05/2003 12:41:33 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: Conservinator
I'm FREEPIN!
34% 306832 votes
66% 605793 votes
3
posted on
08/05/2003 12:42:22 PM PDT
by
e5man_r_u?
(A Man's mission: Build, Protect, Provide)
To: Conservinator
It's CNN...I wouldn't put tooooo much credibility into their polling results.....really....
4
posted on
08/05/2003 12:42:45 PM PDT
by
smiley
To: Conservinator
As seems to be typical of CNN's polls lately, I did view result before voting. Much to my lack of surprise, the yes count did not go up after I voted and refreshed.
5
posted on
08/05/2003 12:42:59 PM PDT
by
Ingtar
To: Conservinator
Trick question, at the national level? no. At the state level? Without a doubt
6
posted on
08/05/2003 12:44:47 PM PDT
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: Conservinator
There has to be something wrong with this poll. No other poll anywhere is anywhere near these results. In fact, EVERY POLL I've seen is almost 2-1 AGAINST homosexual marriage. I wouldn't be surprised if CNN hasn't deliberately reversed these results by mistake or design.
7
posted on
08/05/2003 12:44:57 PM PDT
by
laweeks
(I)
To: breakem
Yes, WE, as in heterosexuals, are behind in the voting. I say yes, marriage should be reserved for a man & woman . . . and the vast majority of people are like me, no matter what the liberal press wants to make us believe!!
To: Conservinator
Should marriage be legally defined as only a union between a man and a woman?
|
|
Yes
|
|
34%
|
307097 votes
|
|
No
|
|
66%
|
605819 votes
|
Total: 912916 votes
|
|
9
posted on
08/05/2003 12:45:23 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Conservinator
They don't even have a million viewers at this time of the day.
Someone is way padding this poll.
10
posted on
08/05/2003 12:46:43 PM PDT
by
exit82
(Constitution?--I got your Constitution right here!--T. Daschle)
To: Conservinator
11
posted on
08/05/2003 12:46:56 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Conservinator
Freep and Bump!
To: Conservinator
13
posted on
08/05/2003 12:47:38 PM PDT
by
autoresponder
(PETA TERRORISTS .wav file: BRUCE FRIEDRICH: http://tinyurl.com/hjhd)
To: Conservinator
The reason we're behind is because the perverts are out in force. Aside from that, who believes anything coming from CNN?
To: Conservinator
Not all heterosexuals, nor all freepers, oppose gay marriage. I thought you had started a club or something. Just wanted to know who you thought your were or if you suffered from multiple personality disorder.
My marriage is neither strengthened or threatened by homosexuals getting married. You might try to lower the divorce rate if you really care about marriage. WE heterosexuals have botched it up pretty badly.
15
posted on
08/05/2003 12:48:42 PM PDT
by
breakem
To: Conservinator
The Gay Jihad has hijacked the poll and are crashing it into the Twin Towers of Reason and Morality.
-Jay
16
posted on
08/05/2003 12:49:18 PM PDT
by
Jay D. Dyson
(Better a Bushbot than a Bubbabot!)
To: Conservinator
Let CNN have this on their record. All the more ammo for not watching them.
17
posted on
08/05/2003 1:05:54 PM PDT
by
Digger
To: laweeks
Yeah, it's a fake poll -- preset to results CNN likes.
18
posted on
08/05/2003 1:37:22 PM PDT
by
demlosers
(Come out of the shadows)
To: Conservinator
Hate to be picky, but 'marriage' already is legally defined as between a man and a woman. If you answer 'yes,' you will subconsciously be supporting the wrong notion that the courts or congress have the authority to RE-DEFINE a word that is already defined. Think about it. If you support that notion, you will have no position to complain if they re-define 'marriage' to include same-sex
Sorry, but the poll is phony, as is CNN. It's hiding the real issue, which is to trick you into supporting the notion that congress or the courts have the authority to re-define words that already have legal definitions. If the homos went the amendment route, they know they would fail. That is why they are mobbing congress and the courts to resolve the issue by adding a couple of words to the definition of the word, 'marriage.'
A new, or different word is need to define whatever it is that homos want to practice. To call it 'marriage' would destroy the meaning of the word, and the institution of holy matrimony which it has always represented.
And to re-define the word, 'marriage,' to mean one man and one woman would be redundant. That would be like renaming a Ford a Ford. Why fix a word if it isn't broken?
Tell CNN to take that piece of socialistic crap and stuff it back into that pile of propaganda dung they spawned it from.
To: Conservinator
20
posted on
08/05/2003 1:56:57 PM PDT
by
FreeRep
(Proud to be American: John 3:16)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson