Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

S. Korea: No more sunshine
Financial Times ^ | August 5 2003

Posted on 08/06/2003 3:00:08 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

No more sunshine

Published: August 5 2003 5:00 | Last Updated: August 5 2003 5:00

For over a decade, the world's dealings with North Korea have been marked by tactical retreat in the face of blackmail. Today, as in 1994, the blackmail is nuclear: the US and its Asian allies are supposed to support the regime financially and politically in exchange for its promise to abandon a nuclear weapons programme it was never supposed to have had in the first place.

The latest victim (and former practitioner) of this kind of unsavoury bargaining with North Korea is Chung Mong-hun, the South Korean businessman who jumped to his death early yesterday from his 12th floor office at Hyundai's headquarters in Seoul. Mr Chung was charged with manipulating Hyundai accounts to hide a $100m transfer of secret government funds to Pyongyang - part of a $500m inducement to Kim Jong-il, the North Korean leader, to meet Kim Dae-jung, then the South Korean president, at a historic summit three years ago.

Pyongyang's evident bad faith since then - the regime has boasted to the US of its nuclear weapons plans and continues to issue bloodcurdling threats of war on the Korean peninsula - has shaken the confidence of even committed supporters of engagement. The government of Roh Moo-hyun, Kim Dae-jung's successor, has diplomatically renamed Mr Kim's "sunshine policy" as the rather less summery "policy for peace and prosperity".

All this makes it easy for Republican hawks in Washington to criticise the dovish South Koreans, not to mention the Clinton administration in the 1990s, for having caved in to North Korea instead of applying firm economic and military pressure on Pyongyang with a view to changing the regime.

Yet if anyone doubts how difficult it is to deal with North Korea or to contemplate the awful alternatives to dialogue, they have only to look at the confusion on the issue within the Bush administration itself. Colin Powell, US secretary of state, this week spoke soothingly of a "diplomatic political solution" to the crisis only three days after John Bolton, one of his deputies, launched a ferocious personal attack on Kim Jong-il. Mr Bolton was dismissed as "human scum" by the North Koreans, but they still agreed to six-nation talks in Beijing that will bring together the US, the two Koreas, China, Japan and Russia.

There are disagreements over how to bring North Korea into the international fold. Some US officials, for example, want to see the crisis end with the collapse of the northern regime and the quick reunification of Korea under southern control, whereas the Chinese and South Korean governments are wary of the political and economic impact of such a drastic change.

After years of Pyongyang's lies, however, there is no excuse for hesitation on the central issue of nuclear weapons. Only one, isolated delegation at the talks can object to Washington's insistence that the weapons programme be dismantled "completely, verifiably and irreversibly".


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chungmonghun; hyundai; nkorea; skorea; suicide; sunshinepolicy
FYI
1 posted on 08/06/2003 3:00:08 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; OahuBreeze; yonif; MEG33; John Valentine
Ping!
2 posted on 08/06/2003 3:07:51 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Will China use its influence,will the years of blackmail end?Will NKorea cut its own throat?Tune in to the endless negotiation that seems to be in store.Kim lives like an emperor while many starve.
3 posted on 08/06/2003 4:24:00 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Re #3

It is like a nightmare. Things get worse and worse. At the worst moment, you suddenly wake up from it. And it is gone.

4 posted on 08/06/2003 5:05:01 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
It has been said what we need to do is show NKorea we won't attack.They were working on Nuclear weapons during the nonthreatening Clinton years despite the agreement and when SKorea was funneling money for "sunshine."I will say the thing that helps the Nkoreans is the fear of an attack on SKorea(though NKorea would suffer and lose ,they could do damage)Now of course they threaten our west coast and Japan.I wish Kim would have a stroke!
5 posted on 08/06/2003 5:25:14 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Re #5

It is tempting to use a voodoo doll and a lot of pins.:)

6 posted on 08/06/2003 5:36:36 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Right!If I only knew the right chants!
7 posted on 08/06/2003 5:38:12 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Carnegie Non-Proliferation Project : North Korea Nuclear and Missile Timeline

2001

17 April

22 February

17 January

2000

28 December 2000

3 November 2000

23 October 2000

10 October 2000

15 June 2000

1999

12 September 1999

1998

31 August 1998

15 July 1998

1996

November 1996

1995

10 March 1995

1994

21 October 1994

13 June 1994

2 June 1994

June 1994

1993

11 June 1993

12 March 1993

1992

May 1992

1991

31 December 1991

19 October 1991

1986

23 June 1986

1985

12 September 1985

 


 

8 posted on 08/06/2003 5:38:31 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
Carnegie Non-Proliferation Project : North Korea Nuclear and Missile Timeline

2001

17 April

22 February

17 January

2000

28 December 2000

3 November 2000

23 October 2000

10 October 2000

15 June 2000

1999

12 September 1999

1998

31 August 1998

15 July 1998

1996

November 1996

1995

10 March 1995

1994

21 October 1994

13 June 1994

2 June 1994

June 1994

1993

11 June 1993

12 March 1993

1992

May 1992

1991

31 December 1991

19 October 1991

1986

23 June 1986

1985

12 September 1985

 


 

9 posted on 08/06/2003 5:38:35 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
  Canada
North Korea Approves Multilateral Nuclear Talks > Audio  (page 3 of 4)
 Audio
- The experiences of N.Korea asylum seekers - BBC (Jun 27, 2001)
- North Korea Seeks Economic, Not Military, Talks with U.S. - NPR (Jun 18, 2001)
- Proposed US-N.Korea Talks: "So far, no official reaction [from South Korea]" - BBC (Jun 7, 2001)
- "There really has not been any... variation in the US support for Kim Dae-Jung's sunshine policy" - BBC (May 10, 2001)
- Japan Detains Suspected Son of North Korea's Leader - NPR (May 3, 2001)
- North Korea: Seeing America through enemy eyes - The Connection - WBUR (Apr 2, 2001)
- South Korea Reshuffles Cabinet - NPR. (Mar 26, 2001)
- U.S. Re-evaluates 1994 Agreement with North Korea - NPR. (Mar 13, 2001)
- Powell voices concern over North Korean army - NPR (Mar 8, 2001)
- Korea into the Future - PBS (Mar 8, 2001)
- "I think the administration will be looking for more movement on security issues" - BBC (Mar 8, 2001)
- "President Bush has made it vey clear tht he will treat North Korea as a signficant threat" - BBC (Mar 8, 2001)
- North Korea's Kim Jong-Il Makes Surprise Visit to China - NPR (Jan 18, 2001)
- "South Korean reports say Mr Kim wants to see for himself China's economic reforms in action" - BBC (Jan 16, 2001)
- North Korea to Hand Over Remains of 15 U.S. Soldiers - NPR (Nov 10, 2000)
- Relations improve between U.S. and North Korea - NPR (Oct 30, 2000)
- U.S. Incursion Casts Shadow on N. Korea Peace Effort - NPR. (Oct 27, 2000)
- Albright Briefs S. Koreans on Trip to North - NPR. (Oct 25, 2000)
- Albright Ends Historic North Korea Visit - NPR (Oct 24, 2000)
- Albright Makes Landmark Visit to North Korea - NPR (Oct 23, 2000)
- "Pyongyang has yet to sign a formal peace agreement with the US" - BBC (Oct 23, 2000)
- Albright To Visit North Korea - NPR. (Oct 12, 2000)
- Thawing Relations - PBS (Oct 11, 2000)
- Clinton Meets With Top North Korean Official - NPR (Oct 10, 2000)
- Korea Reconciliation Developments: U.S. troops - NPR. (Sep 12, 2000)
- North Korea denounces U.S. as 'rogue state' - NPR (Sep 7, 2000)
- "More heart-wrenching scenes as families said their last farewells" - BBC (Aug 17, 2000)
- Historic Family Reunions in North and South Korea - NPR. (Aug 15, 2000)
- "Reopening the offices is yet another sign of warming ties" - BBC (Aug 14, 2000)
- "The agreement underlines the thawing relations between the two Cold War foes" - BBC (Jul 31, 2000)
- Koreas reconnect with offices, railway - CBC (Jul 30, 2000)
- Coca-Cola Enters North Korea - NPR. (Jun 22, 2000)
- Coke Cola spokesman on moving into North Korea - BBC (Jun 22, 2000)
- "US policy is aimed at encouraging North Korea out of its isolation" - BBC (Jun 19, 2000)
- Coming Together - PBS (Jun 14, 2000)
- North-South Korean Summit Postponed by Technical Problems - NPR. (Jun 12, 2000)
- Breaking the Ice - PBS (Apr 10, 2000)
- Two Koreas Agree to Summit - NPR. (Apr 10, 2000)
- South Koreans excited about the news of a summit - BBC (Apr 10, 2000)
- "North Korea has kept the world guessing" - BBC (Apr 10, 2000)
- North and South Korea talk - NPR (Mar 7, 2000)
- South Korea calls on U.S. to investigate war massacre - NPR. (Oct 1, 1999)
- Easing Sanctions: Margaret Warner with William Perry - The Online NewsHour (Sep 17, 1999)
- Albright recommends easing N. Korean trade limits - NPR. (Sep 14, 1999)
- "N.Korea must show it isn't a threat before the US eases sanctions" - BBC (Sep 13, 1999)
- Japan attempts to prevent N. Korea missile tests - NPR (Aug 12, 1999)
- North Korea issues new threat to Japan - CBC (Aug 10, 1999)
- Japan prepares warships over North Korean missile - CBC (Aug 9, 1999)
- "N. Korea's missile programme isn't officially on the agenda" - BBC (Aug 7, 1999)
- U.S. urges N. Korea to shelve missile program - NPR. (Jul 27, 1999)
previous | more 

10 posted on 08/06/2003 5:41:34 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I am amazed that people insist on consistently overanalyzing and ascribing too high a level of complexity to the motivations on international bullies. N. Korea has a very simple, straightforward foreign policy. Namely, they will use force to acquire the property of others in order to prop up their economy until, as they believe will happen, scientific socialism is perfected. In the meantime, they feel morally entitled to the property of others and will use force or the threat to use force as a means to make that acquisition.

This leaves their neighbors(Japan, China, Russia and S. Korea) and other people involved in dealings with them (the US and the UN) with two options. These options involve either giving them what they want/need or beheading them so that they are incapable of further confiscating the property of others.

I don't understand why so many people miss this simple point.
11 posted on 08/06/2003 7:10:25 AM PDT by .cnI redruM ("If you think no one cares about you, try skipping next month's car payment" - Daily Zen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
until, as they believe will happen, scientific socialism is perfected.

To me, they are interested in not so much perfecting the scientific socialism as sustaining the current dynastic regime indefinitely. Other than that, I agree with you. People are reading too much into N. Korean behaviors. Their intentions are really straighforward.

In a decade or two from now, People will be embarassed by what they do now when they will look back at the current period.

12 posted on 08/06/2003 7:26:01 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
13 posted on 08/06/2003 7:30:50 AM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
This is the classic bully situation - at what point do you draw the line and put up your dukes? You really don't want to fight over a small thing when your capitol is within artillery range of the border. But if you don't the things get bigger and bigger as the bully tries to find out what he can get away with.

This particular bully is trying to support a habit off other people's lunch money, and just like a drug habit this economically sterile kleptocracy has just about bottomed out. Nothing left to steal, the ultimate socialist nightmare. The gang is starting to eat its own - and in this case that metaphor is ghoulishly literal.

I think that up to now the North Koreans' ultimate move would have been some sort of atomic test, but that time has, perhaps, passed. A credible threat at this point might just have the U.S. and China sitting down at a table discussing what sort of interim government the North will have after the former have flattened the place. That conversation may already have taken place, but if not, we're close.

14 posted on 08/06/2003 7:48:50 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
As we enter the "negotiating phase" here, a really good background read is "Over the Line: North Korea's Negotiating Strategy", by Chuck Downs and James Lilley -- a real good historical analysis of their bizarre negotiating behavior.

This is pretty black and white, and, indeed, history will look badly on those who were "trying to figure this thing out." Too little attention has been paid to the suffering and death of generations of human beings in North Korea, if that ever becomes a relevant factor.
15 posted on 08/07/2003 2:25:35 AM PDT by OahuBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson