Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I have a question, and I'd really like an answer
Vanity | 08/06/03 | Zionist Conspirator

Posted on 08/06/2003 12:20:52 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last
To: Little Bill
Hey, Bill! How are ya?

Silly season is right. Or left. Or something...

61 posted on 08/06/2003 2:55:49 PM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
A few thoughtful responses have indeed been made and I have simply pondered them.

Why don't you just try answering them?

62 posted on 08/06/2003 2:59:13 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
hypocrisy of American counterparts of foreign ideologies that are so different

Can't read somebody's mind. What American counterparts of what foreign ideologies and what hypocrisy?

63 posted on 08/06/2003 3:02:38 PM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Weird websites abound. What does that one or LF have to do with your extremely generalized rant? You are making some very strange agit-prop type statements without any specifics. Get credible, or get lost.

I don't understand why my questions are making you so angry.

Angry? I'm not mad at you, I'm responding, bluntly, in kind, to your strange imaginings.

They are honest questions about an actual phenomenon. Are you perhaps interpreting my questions as an attack on FR or conservatism?

I think you're attacking libertarians in general.

First, I have been a FReeper a long time and second, the people I am criticizing are among the biggest FR-haters around. They talk about you all the time so why shouldn't I ask you for your opinions as to why their ideology twists and turns the way it does?

"They" talk about me to you? Who's they?

I'm sorry, but if this doesn't placate you somewhat then I don't know what to do. I'm not attacking you or any FReeper (except for jerks like "JohnGalt") and I fail to understand your hostility.

'JohnGalt', imo, has always posted from a sound, well reasoned POV. Pretty bizarro attack, ZC.


64 posted on 08/06/2003 3:11:26 PM PDT by tpaine (Really, I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but principles keep getting in me way.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: metesky; swilhelm73; Madame Dufarge; Mr.Atos
Again, I don't know why my questions has offended you all so much. I honestly don't. Did you interpret them as some sort of attack on yourselves personally? Or are you basically accusing me of not having seen that website where President Bush is caricatured as a sort of Mao Tse-tung?

I doubt very seriously if JimRob would allow any hyperlinks here, but I will give you the URL's to some of these sites (and hope they don't get pulled anyway).

www.FriendsOfLiberty.com (the one that started it all).

www.originaldissent.com

www.libertyforum.com

www.jbs.org (the one I used to be a member of)

www.thenewamerican.com (its current magazine)

www.welchreport.com (dissafected Birchers who want to blame the "conspiracy" directly on the "Zionists" and want the Society to endorse chr*stianity. Not too long ago it featured many nasty anti-Israel and anti-Jewish headlines as well as explicit attack on "Zionism," but I had a nice e-mail correspondence with the head guy and this has been mitigated somewhat. I advise that you look at old archived articles/press releases for what I'm talking about.)

www.alanstang.com (the man whose rhetoric got me into the Society but who now blames American interventionism directly on the "Zionists"--this was not at his site but at the Welch Report site. You'll have to click on archived articles at www.welchreport.com to read it).

www.revilo-oliver.com (Oliver was one of the original founders of the small government, libertarian JBS but who later became an out-and-out national socialist, going on about "aryans" and so forth. If there is no connection whatsoever between fascism/national socialism and the right, why did he go from JBS to racialism? Why didn't he come from the Communist movement instead? Obviously he thought that the original purpose of JBS was consonant with national socialism but had been hijacked.)

These are but a few of what can be found on the web. More can be found with any web search. I simply am asking my fellow FReepers what is wrong with these people who attack President Bush (and US) as "war mongers" when they have no trouble with war-mongering as long as it's by the "right" people. Are they not hypocrites to attack us? What is your interpretation of this phenomenon?

65 posted on 08/06/2003 3:14:45 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (G-d's laws or NONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Pinochet was a general fighting a war. His country was being invaded by Czech Stb agents, East German Stasi and Cuban Secret Police. Allende had trashed the Chilean constitution. The parliament, the barrios and the middle class were demanding action. One cannot compare wartime necessities to conservative ideology. Pinochet did transition the country to a free market and did voluntary cede power. Those actions are very conservative. Btw...today Chile has more direct American investment than all the other countries in South and Central America combined.

Pinochet is a hero. He did what Hitler's generals should have done. Which is why Lady Thatcher awarded him an Armada Cup.

66 posted on 08/06/2003 3:14:50 PM PDT by DPB101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Suggestion. If you are going to begin a provocative thread, support it.

Its too bad. There was good potential here as it begans to autopsy the American political scenme as it is relevant to world politics.

American View = Individual rights, Property rights, Constitutional Primacy, Phliosophy of Life, Capitalism = Right!

World View = Human Rights, Global Justice(?), Statist, Totalitarian Authority, Pragmatism, Collectivism, Death = Left.

Ping me if it comes up again in a more productive forum.

67 posted on 08/06/2003 3:17:39 PM PDT by Mr.Atos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
'JohnGalt', imo, has always posted from a sound, well reasoned POV. Pretty bizarro attack, ZC.

Not to mention extending the courtesy of pinging someone to a post on which you're attacking them.

68 posted on 08/06/2003 3:19:49 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: DPB101
Pinochet was a general fighting a war. His country was being invaded by Czech Stb agents, East German Stasi and Cuban Secret Police. Allende had trashed the Chilean constitution. The parliament, the barrios and the middle class were demanding action. One cannot compare wartime necessities to conservative ideology. Pinochet did transition the country to a free market and did voluntary cede power. Those actions are very conservative. Btw...today Chile has more direct American investment than all the other countries in South and Central America combined.

Pinochet is a hero. He did what Hitler's generals should have done. Which is why Lady Thatcher awarded him an Armada Cup.

I do not disagree with any of this. But is it not hypocritical for people who justify Pinochet's methods to mercilessly attack President Bush and we FReepers for doing the same thing with regard to the terrorist forces that are infiltrating us? These people who never raised a peep at Pinochet want Bush's hide because he is creating a "police state!" Isn't it obvious that these people have no trouble with police states when created by "the right people?"

My attacks are on hypocrisy, not anti-Communism. As a matter of fact I think anti-Communists in other countries (Chiang Kai-shek eg) were far more enlightened than the American right wing, which wishes to wed anti-Communism to social darwinism, whereas Chiang fought all his life for the "Three Principals of the People." But that does not mitigate the hypocrisy of some of his admirers who applaud what he did but would have died rather than see such policies in America.

69 posted on 08/06/2003 3:20:56 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (G-d's laws or NONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Atos
American View = Individual rights, Property rights, Constitutional Primacy, Phliosophy of Life, Capitalism = Right!

World View = Human Rights, Global Justice(?), Statist, Totalitarian Authority, Pragmatism, Collectivism, Death = Left.

Where do Franco and Salazar fit in this little dualism of yours? Or will you attack me for asking?

70 posted on 08/06/2003 3:22:56 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (G-d's laws or NONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
So to some it all up, you are asking why a handful of fringe wackoes attack the president and like foreign fascists? I would wager that's because they are a handful of fringe wackoes.

If this was the 'movement' you are so worried about, you can now rest your weary head.

Oh, and I would suggest if you continue to maintain fascism as a rightist philosphy you answer the hordes of posts with proof of the opposite in this very thread.
71 posted on 08/06/2003 3:25:27 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
The answer is simple. You're using a false political scale. A true scale measures opposites.

A true political scale would have absolute tyranny on the left end and absolute anarchy on the right end (or vice-versa, doesn't matter).

In the middle you would have a perfect balance, i.e., a Constitutional Republic, rule of law, separation of powers, limited government. In other words, what the Framers gave us.

So when the media characterizes "Constitutionalists" as "extreme right wingers" they are engaging in deliberate propaganda, knowingly.

72 posted on 08/06/2003 3:26:02 PM PDT by handk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
Again, I don't know why my questions has offended you all so much.

Your questions haven't offended me at all. I thought you were looking for a give and take, as offered by many.

You haven't responded in that spirit.

In fact, I'm getting a whiff of "he done me wrong."

One way to avoid becoming disaffected by groups is to avoid them.

Just an observation from my journey.

73 posted on 08/06/2003 3:29:44 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator; swilhelm73; Madame Dufarge; Mr.Atos
Friends of Liberty

Original Dissent

Liberty Forum

John Birch Society

The New American

The Welch Report

Alan Stang

Revilo-Oliver

74 posted on 08/06/2003 3:32:06 PM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
I think you're attacking libertarians in general.

I do not attack libertarians who advocate libertarianism and peace at all times and in all places. I do attack a certain type of libertarian who attacks his own government as a "police state" for doing things he justifies when other people do them in other countries. I'm sorry if you're one of those libertarians.

'JohnGalt', imo, has always posted from a sound, well reasoned POV. Pretty bizarro attack, ZC.

When someone calling himself "tpaine" defends someone who continually thumps J*sus you know you've stumbled onto strange territory. Perhaps your and his chr*stianity is that deistic Jeffersonian brand that has been freed of all polluting Jewish influence?

75 posted on 08/06/2003 3:34:23 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (G-d's laws or NONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: handk
So when the media characterizes "Constitutionalists" as "extreme right wingers" they are engaging in deliberate propaganda, knowingly.

Well said.

76 posted on 08/06/2003 3:40:34 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
So to some it all up, you are asking why a handful of fringe wackoes attack the president and like foreign fascists? I would wager that's because they are a handful of fringe wackoes.

That is essentially it. The John Birch Society told me that fascism and communism were both on the left. So why is it that whenever people admire Mussolini or Franco or Salazar or Peron that they are always shooting off their bazoos about "limited constitutional government" and attacking "neocons" as "big government conservatives?" Obviously the Society lied to me. I was being manipulated. The extreme right, whatever its libertarian public posture, seems to be a brainwashing machine for turning people into fascist sympathizers (fascism in other countries that is), all the while attacking their own country as "communist" for doing the same things!

I am sorry if my own personal experience with these people does not allow me an objective stance.

If this was the 'movement' you are so worried about, you can now rest your weary head.

I want to know why they are not advocating here what they support elsewhere. I want to know why, if "fascism is on the left," these people aren't attacking the communists and claiming to be "the true left" instead of attacking us and claiming to be "the true right!"

Oh, and I would suggest if you continue to maintain fascism as a rightist philosphy you answer the hordes of posts with proof of the opposite in this very thread.

Then why aren't all the apologists for foreign fascism ex-communists instead of ex-Birchers? That's all I want to know.

77 posted on 08/06/2003 3:43:02 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (G-d's laws or NONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I am sorry if my own personal experience with these people does not allow me an objective stance.

I'm sorry your world was so small and informed your opinions.

There are many hands being offered here as an antidote, but you seem to be resisting or not listening.

78 posted on 08/06/2003 3:48:56 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I do not attack libertarians who advocate libertarianism and peace at all times and in all places.

Including self defense?

79 posted on 08/06/2003 3:50:44 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Can't read somebody's mind. What American counterparts of what foreign ideologies and what hypocrisy?

If have read my posts at all (including the original one) then you cannot make this statement with a straight face.

80 posted on 08/06/2003 3:54:21 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (G-d's laws or NONE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson