Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: liberallarry
But I also believe - and support - the idea that the Administration exagerated the immediate dangers because its real reasons could not honestly be sold to the American public, and lack of action would have exposed the country to ever worse dangers.

What are you thinking the "real reasons" could be?
I myself don't think the Bush admin exaggerated one bit. I don't think the American people needed to be sold on the idea of our intervention into Iraq again.

61 posted on 08/09/2003 10:28:57 AM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: jla
What are you thinking the "real reasons" could be?

As I've said repeatedly, the danger comes from Muslim culture, not just Iraq and Saddam. It's this culture that breeds such people as Saddam, Osama, Khomeini, suicide bombers, Ghaddafi, etc., etc. They don't need WMDs to do us great harm - as 911 showed. Since we can't defend against boxcutters we've decided to attack the threat at its source. That's the real reason.

65 posted on 08/09/2003 10:46:08 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson