Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illegal Aliens Testify Against United States Citizens
Yuma Sun ^ | August 9, 2003 | Louie Villalobos

Posted on 08/09/2003 12:13:28 PM PDT by GoRepGo

Illegals held at gunpoint discuss ordeal

By Louie Villalobos Aug 9, 2003

SAN LUIS RIO COLORADO, Son. — The two female illegal immigrants who authorities said were detained at gunpoint by three American citizens a week ago said they initially thought the men were U.S. Border Patrol agents.

But when two of the men pointed guns at them and the three boys traveling with them, Lorena Ocampo said she knew something was wrong.

"(The Border Patrol) doesn't do that to women and children," she said.

More than a week after the incident, Ocampo, 26, her friend Guadalupe Lopez Rodriguez, 31, and the three boys were sent back to Mexico under the agreement that they would return at a later date to testify against Matthew Hoffman, 23, and Alexander Dumas, 26.

The men are each facing six counts of aggravated assault and five counts of unlawful imprisonment and one count of conspiracy to commit unlawful imprisonment, after the Yuma County Sheriff's Office said they handcuffed the group of illegal immigrants and held them at gunpoint until Border Patrol agents arrived.

Authorities said a third man, Martin Hoffman Jr., was with the two suspects but isn't facing charges because he was unarmed and didn't take part in the detention of the illegal immigrants.

Bond for Hoffman and Dumas was recently set at $68,000 and $88,000, respectively. The incident remains under investigation.

Both officials and the women said the incident began just after 1 a.m., a few minutes after the group entered illegally through the Colorado River at County 18th Street.

Rodriguez said they were traveling with a larger group that included the two women's husbands, but the smugglers decided to split everyone up to allow the children to cross at a shallow part of the river. The women said they wanted to go with their children.

"It wasn't that deep," Ocampo said of the river. "The kids crossed easily."

Minutes after crossing, the women said they heard a noise and were told to duck down behind some bushes by the 16-year-old smuggler who was guiding them. After waiting for a while, they decided it was safe to continue, Ocampo said.

"Then these men came out," she said. "I don't know where they came from."

The men started yelling directions in English and motioning the group to get on the ground, Ocampo said. At first, because one was wearing military-style clothes and they all hand handcuffs, the women thought they had been caught by agents and told their boys not to worry.

But when the guns were pointed at them, Ocampo knew the men weren't agents.

"We were all scared," she said. "We didn't know what they were yelling."

After Ocampo said the men handcuffed the women, the smuggler and two of the boys, a helicopter — which belonged to the Border Patrol — arrived at the scene and the men began to flag it down with a flashlight.

Soon after that, the women said agents arrived, uncuffed the group and put them in the back of their vehicles.

"(The agents) told us what those men did was against the law," Ocampo said.

After being taken to the Border Patrol's station house and being questioned about the incident, the women said they were kept in an area hotel and eventually given the option of staying in the United States until it was time for them to testify against the suspects.

Ocampo said they decided to return to Mexico because they are still scared that something will happen to them. She said the group will most likely not try another illegal entry into the United States because of the incident. Their husbands were caught and deported, Ocampo said.

She said they were headed to New York, where they planned to live with family members, get a job and put their children into public school.

Ocampo did promise to return when it came time to testify, though, saying she wants to make sure Hoffman and Dumas are punished.

"What they did was wrong," she said.

--- Louie Villalobos can be reached at lvillalobos@yumasun.com or 539-6858.

© Copyright, YumaSun.com

The three children who were held at gunpoint by Matthew Hoffman and Alexander Dumas sit in the back of a van waiting to be taken back to Mexico at the U.S. Port of Entry at San Luis, Ariz., Friday. Photo by Alfred J. Hernandez


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; arizona; bizarre; borderpatrol; illegals; immigration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-180 next last
To: BlackElk
It would be much better for the country if Bush withdrew his reelection bid.
61 posted on 08/09/2003 2:26:49 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
You've made your anti-Christian views so clearly.

You call anyone who believes in the Bible a "fundamentalist" and "pro-slavery".

I'm neither.

62 posted on 08/09/2003 2:27:59 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
It's now anti-Christian to be opposed to slavery? Have you considered obtaining professional help?
63 posted on 08/09/2003 2:30:04 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
The problem is that a concentrated group of people get large benefits from cheap illegal labor and a diffuse group of people pay for the burdens of it. Whenever that phenomonenon occurs, it is very hard to get government to move. All the people who donate and agitate are naturally going to be on the beneficiary side.

With illegals from Mexico, though, the basic flumoxing factor is that the people who are MOST hurt by it -- blacks, organized labor -- are people who are too tied up in their race-baiting ideology to act in their own self interests. That makes it even harder to overcome the basic inertia.
64 posted on 08/09/2003 2:31:39 PM PDT by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm; ninenot
As a matter of fact, why don't you guys use your energies to work against Aaaaaaaahnold in California since he opposed the precious Holy Grail of the Border: Proposition 187 which was unconstitutionally designed (at least according to constitutionally illiterate federal court usurpers) to prevent the payment by public funds of social benefits to illegals.

If you help stop a RINO like Aaaaaaaahnold, then you will do more for your movement than Tancredo ever will. OR, if you think Tancredo is effective as I do not, send him to California which has a lot of people who agree with you to hold Aaaaaaahnold to account. If Tancredo won't do that, how much does he really care for your cause and how much does he care for himself?

Aaaaaaahnold is being pumped as such a sure thing that dramatic punishment for his support for services to illegals WILL put politicians in fear of you far easier than will self-annointed Barney Fifes on the border.

65 posted on 08/09/2003 2:31:55 PM PDT by BlackElk ( It is always a good day to hunt RINOs without mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Do you believe that the Bible is the Word of God? Yes or no?

I have never said that I support slavery, but keep repeating your anti-Christian mantra.

Do you believe that the Bible is the Word of God? Yes or no?

66 posted on 08/09/2003 2:33:28 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I don't support slavery. What's your point?
67 posted on 08/09/2003 2:33:46 PM PDT by BlackElk ( It is always a good day to hunt RINOs without mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
I don't live in California. At least Tancredo is a conservative - something that no rational person can say about Bush.
68 posted on 08/09/2003 2:35:07 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
You have made it perfectly clear that you approve of slavery because the Bible accepts it
69 posted on 08/09/2003 2:37:48 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf
"She said they were headed to New York, where they planned to live with family members, get a job and put their children into public school.
Ocampo did promise to return when it came time to testify, though, saying she wants to make sure Hoffman and Dumas are punished.
"What they did was wrong," she said. "

It is this attitude that is pushing so many Americans to the border in defense. The Illegal population believes they have a RIGHT to be here. Clearly something needs to happen so they are too afraid to sneak in. It's the only way to force them through proper ports of entry.

70 posted on 08/09/2003 2:39:19 PM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Why do refuse to answer the clear question: "Do you believe that the Bible is the Word of God?"

Are you a godless atheist? Are you a pagan?

I have never said that I support slavery.

For the record, I do not support slavery.

Why don't you answer the question: "Do you believe that the Bible is the Word of God?"

71 posted on 08/09/2003 2:40:34 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: the Deejay
Your grandson no doubt gets a lot better education at that $2,000 per year prvate Christian School without the pro-abortion, pro-gay, anti-religious, anti-God, anti-military, anti-American agendas that would be shoved down his throat at government schools.

The reason there are government indoctrination centers (schools) is so that your grandson and my daughters will have sheep to govern.

72 posted on 08/09/2003 2:41:21 PM PDT by BlackElk ( It is always a good day to hunt RINOs without mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
If you ever decide to return to the world of reality from the alternative universe of Tommy Temper Tantrum, be sure to let us know. This is one lifelong Republican that will NEVER support border mania an that's not sarcasm. Your boy is an embarassment.
73 posted on 08/09/2003 2:43:23 PM PDT by BlackElk ( It is always a good day to hunt RINOs without mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
According to your interpretation, to be anti-slavery is to be anti-Christian. I guess that by your own standard you are a heretic if you are now stating that you don't believe in slavery.
74 posted on 08/09/2003 2:44:24 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: george wythe; sarcasm
I think sarcasm has answered your question. He believes that the pronunciamentos of the Barney Fifes of the border are the word of whtever god (probably himself) he may worship.
75 posted on 08/09/2003 2:45:28 PM PDT by BlackElk ( It is always a good day to hunt RINOs without mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
The only embarrassment is George Bush and his supporters who call him a conservative.
76 posted on 08/09/2003 2:45:41 PM PDT by sarcasm (Tancredo 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
"report them to the INS"...been there, done that. Could tell about as much difference as I could sticking my hand in a bucket of water, pulling it out and looking for an imprint.

And I live in Alabama. We have a load of illegals, too.

vaudine
77 posted on 08/09/2003 2:47:18 PM PDT by vaudine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm; george wythe
nless and until you give some coherent explanation of the significance of your silly question, why would anyone discuss it further with you. GW and I have both answered your question and I at least don't need you interpreting my answer or his when you cannot even explain your incoherent line. We both said we were anti-slavery. He said Scripture did not require the manumission of slaves. His answer and my answer and the truth as to Scripture which he posted are not inconsistent. No one in our country owns slaves. No slave exists in our country legally bound to a master. No slave has been legally purchased here or legally born into slavery here who is still alive. If the Barney Fife's have pastors and/or lawyers, you might want to go and find out what you are talking about. Even they are probably more coherent than you.
78 posted on 08/09/2003 2:52:16 PM PDT by BlackElk ( It is always a good day to hunt RINOs without mercy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
"The reason there are government indoctrination centers (schools) is so that your grandson and my daughters will have sheep to govern."

LOL! Never thought of it like that but I think you're right!

No, my grandson doesn't learn about the pro-abortion, pro-gay, etc., that the public schools spend more time learning that the things they should be learning. In fact, the Christian School is 2 - 3 grades ahead of the PS. The kindergarten in the Christian School doesn't spend time coloring & the like, such as public schools.

My grandson's class actually WORKED! Before Christmas, he could write (cursive), read spell (third grade words.)

At the end of the yr., my grandson won 6 awards. One was for "Best Christian Citizen". I am soooooo proud!!

79 posted on 08/09/2003 2:52:25 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
According to your interpretation, to be anti-slavery is to be anti-Christian. I guess that by your own standard you are a heretic if you are now stating that you don't believe in slavery.

Since you seem to an amoral godless atheist, you have no scruples about throwing around your false accusations.

I have never said that being anti-Christian equals being anti-slavery.

You called me a “pro-slavery fundamentalist” because I quoted the Bible, period.

I have never said that I supported slavery, and the record is open for everyone to see.

You wanted to know about the historical justifications for slavery, and I kindly provided you with a biblical quote commonly used during the slavery epoch to justify slavery.

I have never said that I supported slavery, godless atheist.

80 posted on 08/09/2003 2:52:37 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson