Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury acquits pilot, who questioned IRS, of tax-evasion counts
The Commercial Appeal (Memphis) | August 9, 2003 | Shirley Downing

Posted on 08/09/2003 12:38:00 PM PDT by citizenx7

A federal jury Friday found FedEx pilot Vernice Kuglin not guilty of evading income taxes on $920,000.

The question of tax payment was unresolved at the end of the five-day trial.

"I think it is safe to assume the IRS will attempt civil collection, but she is not guilty of tax evasion," said defense attorney Robert Bernhoft of Milwaukee.

"I feel justified," a grinning Kuglin said after the verdict was returned at mid--afternoon. She stood outside the federal building, chatting with supporters and jurors.

Federal prosecutor Joe Murphy was not available for comment.

Kuglin, 58, was charged with six counts of tax evasion that could have meant up to 30 years in prison and $1.5 million in fines.

The government accused Kuglin of filing false W4 forms for the period from 1996 to 2001.

Kuglin, a pilot for FedEx since 1985, said she had paid taxes like anyone else for most of her life. But about 10 or 11 years ago, she began to question the federal tax system. She began to read court documents, legal opinions and the federal tax code.

She said she found what she felt were contradictions. She wanted to know where in the federal tax code it said she was liable for taxes.

Kuglin wrote the Internal Revenue Service twice in 1995 with questions but said she didn't get a response.

Murphy, in closing arguments on Thursday, said Kuglin did have an opportunity to discuss her situation with the IRS, to learn what she owed and what documents she was required to file "and she didn't."

Defense attorney Larry Becraft of Huntsville, Ala., said Kuglin decided mandatory payment of income taxes "did not apply to her."

After the verdict Friday, Becraft said the federal tax code is a confusing conglomeration that "at best is a walking due process violation."

He said the average American simply doesn't understand the tax code.

Juror Barbara Snodgras of Memphis said the jury did not convict because "we all felt that the prosecution didn't prove its case."

When asked if she planned to start paying federal income taxes again, Kuglin replied: "I will pay all the taxes for which I am liable."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: irs; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Tribune7
ping
41 posted on 08/10/2003 6:34:29 PM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: citizenx7
I found it mentioned on the court calendar but no details

Can you provide a link to the article?

42 posted on 08/10/2003 6:43:53 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
bump
43 posted on 08/10/2003 6:58:00 PM PDT by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bigaln2
I checked out your link. All this law says is that I have to file a return. It doesn't say I'm liable for any taxes.

Big difference. Try again.

44 posted on 08/10/2003 7:13:18 PM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wcbtinman
"I checked out your link. All this law says is that I have to file a return. It doesn't say I'm liable for any taxes."

Yes, that's correct. And when you fill out the form truthfully you demonstrate that you have taxable income. And the form says that you have to send them that amount.
45 posted on 08/11/2003 10:56:32 AM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
IIRC, income is only on the profits from investments. Compensation for your labor is not income.
46 posted on 08/11/2003 1:30:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: citizenx7
This is the Sixth District (6th District). I wonder if it can be used as case law precedent in other districts besides the 6th.
47 posted on 08/11/2003 3:14:50 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
Makes sense to me, I don't get how most morons miss that, but thank God for morons, otherwise we'd have something worse.
48 posted on 08/12/2003 8:36:46 AM PDT by norraad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jla
You are most welcome. We have our work cut out for us, but we can win this battle. With your help, of course, and the help of other Patriotic Americans.

Want to see it again?

“I have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” [Thomas Jefferson, letter to Benjamin Rush, 1800.]

Click here to help us scrap the Code, scrap the IRS and abolish the VLWC!

You can also click here to sign a petition in support of Fundamental Tax Replacement.

We will never be a truly FRee people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS.

49 posted on 08/13/2003 6:23:00 AM PDT by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Sorry, I don't have a link to the article, if the newspaper is on the web, I'm sure it can be located. Of greater interest to me, would be to see if the story was picked up by any major media? I have heard it discussed on at least one talk radio station, but not a network, so far.

The information deserves to be distributed far and wide!
50 posted on 08/13/2003 3:11:35 PM PDT by citizenx7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: citizenx7
It's all over now. Saw it on Fox News this evening. :-)
51 posted on 08/13/2003 7:26:37 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
Found the original article here:

http://www.gomemphis.com/mca/local_news/article/0,1426,MCA_437_2169609,00.html

Understand that Fox has carried the story, anyone seen it on other major media?
52 posted on 08/17/2003 8:44:55 AM PDT by citizenx7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: citizenx7
I saw it here first then got it confirmed on Fox (I think it was Britt Hume). I think WorldNetDaily carried it also.

I can't say if the socialist dinosaur newspapers carried it, since I gave up reading them.

53 posted on 08/17/2003 8:48:54 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
"I checked out your link. All this law says is that I have to file a return. It doesn't say I'm liable for any taxes."

Yes, that's correct. And when you fill out the form truthfully you demonstrate that you have taxable income. And the form says that you have to send them that amount.

Sorry I didn't come across this 4 years ago, but, That's a B.S. argument! Only one who is "Subject to" the tax has any obligation to calculate the amount of tax owed or even fill out any tax form. Only after one is "made subject to" the tax can one be expected to comply with ANY requirements of that tax's laws.

If you were to notice all other taxes have a statement making one "liable for" or "subject to" the tax and then details on how to calculate and/or what is included or what is not included to be taxed. The income tax laws included everything EXCEPT what activity the tax is levied upon. I say activity because the Supreme court ruled that the income tax IS an excise tax (Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103, 112-13, 36 S.Ct. 278 (1916)), and an excise tax is a tax that is levied upon some taxable activity or privilege, such as conducting business with the privilege of a license. Therefore, for the income tax to apply to someone, the taxable activity must be stated for that person to be "subject to" the tax. Since no taxable activity is the stated subject of the tax, it applies to NO-ONE.

54 posted on 01/14/2008 1:00:14 PM PST by logic (Support Duncan Hunter for the 2008 GOP presidential nominee. He is the ONLY conservative candidate!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson