Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Discovering WMD (WMD announcement coming in September)
Townhall.com ^ | August 9, 2003 | Robert Novak

Posted on 08/09/2003 6:04:59 PM PDT by LongsforReagan

Discovering WMD Robert Novak (archive)

August 9, 2003 | Print | Send

WASHINGTON -- Former international weapons inspector David Kay, now seeking Iraqi weapons of mass destruction for the Pentagon, has privately reported successes that are planned to be revealed to the public in mid-September.

Kay has told his superiors he has found substantial evidence of biological weapons in Iraq, plus considerable missile development. He has been less successful in locating chemical weapons, and has not yet begun a substantial effort to locate progress toward nuclear arms.

Senior officials in the Bush administration believe Kay's weapons discoveries should have been revealed as they were made. However, a decision, approved by President Bush, was made to wait until more was discovered and then announce it -- probably in September.

GRILLING THE NSC

The two senior staffers of the National Security Council (NSC), who have been reported responsible for the famous 16 words in President Bush's State of the Union address, were cross-examined privately by congressional interrogators on Aug. 1.

Deputy National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley was questioned briefly by bipartisan aides of the Senate and House intelligence committees. Robert Joseph, the senior NSC staffer who actually wrote the 16 words reporting alleged Iraqi efforts to buy uranium from Africa, was then grilled for over three hours.

The congressional staffers came downtown to question Hadley and Joseph at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next door to the White House. The president had refused to permit NSC officials to be interrogated in public or to go to Capitol Hill for the questioning.

LABOR INFIGHTING

Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean's campaign scored a political victory, with the help of his newly named labor operative, by stopping the AFL-CIO's immediate endorsement of Rep. Richard Gephardt for the Democratic presidential nomination.

Gephardt, backed by 11 unions, pushed hard for the labor federation's endorsement at the AFL-CIO meeting in Chicago this past week. Bob Mullenkamp, Dean's new labor aide, worked to postpone further consideration of the issue until another meeting was called for October.

Mullenkamp was an aide to former Teamsters president Ron Carey and is on poor terms with the union's present leadership headed by James P. Hoffa, a strong supporter of Gephardt. Mullenkamp is married to Karen Ackerman, currently political director of the AFL-CIO.

DASCHLE DISHED

The usually astute Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle committed a rare tactical blunder just before the August recess when he agreed to a procedure opening the way to passage of a Republican-style energy bill.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was under attack for interrupting Senate debate on the energy bill, at White House request, to bring up stalled judicial nominations. In an obvious effort to goad Frist, Daschle took the Senate floor to say that one way to pass an energy bill before the recess was to rubber-stamp the bill passed in the then Democratic-controlled Senate last year. Frist took him up on the offer, and a surprised Daschle had no alternative to concurring in his own proposition.

That gives Senate Energy Committee Chairman Pete Domenici the opportunity to craft a bill to Republican specifications in the Senate-House conference. He has made clear he will return to the Senate with a bill resembling the Republican-drafted House measure.

9/11 POLITICS

Republican members of the special 9/11 investigating commission were delighted to lose former Sen. Max Cleland as a colleague when he accepted President Bush's appointment as a Democratic director of the Export-Import Bank, a full-time job.

Cleland, still obviously bitter over his defeat for re-election in Georgia last year, was the most anti-Bush member of the bipartisan commission headed by former New Jersey Republican Gov. Tom Kean. He remains furious about last year's ads for victorious Republican Saxby Chambliss depicting Cleland as weak on homeland security.

Bipartisanship at the commission is unlikely to improve, however. Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle will select Cleland's successor, and he will not pick anyone who is soft on President Bush.

©2003 Creators Syndicate


TOPICS: Breaking News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushjustified; davidkay; liberalswrong; robertnovak; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Cant believe this wasnt posted yet, but I didnt see it anywhere. I cant wait for this!
1 posted on 08/09/2003 6:05:00 PM PDT by LongsforReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
The liberals have a LOT of steaming crow to digest in the coming months.

Their reaction, mark my words, will be: 'who cares if Iraq had WMDs? It doesn't matter, the USA still had no right to do what they did blah blah'. This, of course, is easily foreseen as the obvious anti-American agenda of the left.
2 posted on 08/09/2003 6:07:19 PM PDT by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
its way too soon for this, unless its jaw dropping, if it does not include actual discovery of material, it won't do anything to move public opinion. they are better off waiting.
3 posted on 08/09/2003 6:09:34 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
See you in September

See you in September

See you in September

4 posted on 08/09/2003 6:15:05 PM PDT by Rome2000 (Convicted felons for Kerry, McCarthy was right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
better off waiting until after the democratic primaries methinks...

Wait until they have their foot completely in their mouth.

5 posted on 08/09/2003 6:19:49 PM PDT by delapaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
Hey Demorats, you wanna be the first ones to sniff the bio/chem weapons when they are found? Come on, put your money where you mouth is.
6 posted on 08/09/2003 6:22:12 PM PDT by TheDon (Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
its way too soon for this, unless its jaw dropping

I agree. I have always thought Bush and company have a series of developments that they will unearth as the election draws near.

Problem is I am not sure if anyone is really going to care much about Saddam, Bin Laden and WMD come election time.Heck, I don't even care much and barely click on a thread relating to these topics anymore, six months ago they were the only threads I read.

I think we can safely bet what the issue is going to be come election time.

7 posted on 08/09/2003 6:26:57 PM PDT by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
9-11 would be an excellent day to announce what we've known all along.
8 posted on 08/09/2003 6:39:01 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
YES! This is hardball at it's best!!
9 posted on 08/09/2003 6:49:04 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense
Rintense, you have an exquisite sense of timing :)
10 posted on 08/09/2003 6:49:29 PM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libertina
Why thank you. Let's hope Bush does too! ;)
11 posted on 08/09/2003 6:56:33 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rintense
It'll be wonderful to watch the Dumb-o-crats choke on yellow cake.
12 posted on 08/09/2003 6:59:31 PM PDT by zencat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
He has been less successful in locating chemical weapons...

Translation: no WMD on the horizon.

Can't this guy shut up until he actually finds something?
13 posted on 08/09/2003 7:06:16 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
I am all for waiting until 1 October right before the California election!
14 posted on 08/09/2003 7:07:18 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delapaz
That's too late. I don't know where Novak is getting this info, but previous reports, INCLUDING KAY'S PUBLIC STATEMENTS, was that this would be coming out 6 months from now (or more like mid-July). That is well after September.
15 posted on 08/09/2003 7:09:45 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: riri
economy?

I think that the public will care about this come election time, if we find WMD and/or Saddam....better yet, Osama, but quite frankly, I think he will croak in a couple years without ever being caught.
16 posted on 08/09/2003 7:12:31 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
In September, as an early "October Surprise?"
17 posted on 08/09/2003 9:03:26 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
Previously posted here
18 posted on 08/09/2003 9:03:44 PM PDT by TennTuxedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
He has been less successful in locating chemical weapons... Translation: no WMD on the horizon.

No. What David Kay said in an earlier interview was that so far they've only concentrated on bio weapons. They haven't even started trying to look for chem weapons and nukes yet.

19 posted on 08/09/2003 9:34:11 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LongsforReagan
Good news! Bumpity-bump!
20 posted on 08/09/2003 10:48:57 PM PDT by bdeaner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson