[MHGinTN]

If you are going to use this argument, then so is God or Mother Nature, as 40% of all embryos fail to develop into human beings. Xbob You assume that which you seek to prove ... 'embryonic individual lives are not human beings, yet' and expect folks to give any credance to your babble?

So abortionists are merely emulating nature/God. Xbob Your juvenile syllogisms are astonishing for their nihilistic simplicity, but I ought not be astonished by your mutagenic thinking after all the threads I've endured of your ignorant offerings.

You make some interesting, yet invalid observations, comparing banning of dangerous things to allowing a less dangerous thing. Xbob Partial birth abortions (to cite but one killing methodology) are designed to kill an alive, individual human being who has not yet been born but who is scientifically, verifiably alive and sentient, even dreaming when asleep and able to learn! Assaulting the baby in the womb with an aim to kill her is very dangerous to the baby (deadly in fact and you champion that) and effects the woman in whose body the baby is/was receiving life support, as testified to by the women who've had their children killed in utero and lived to regret it. Your chosen omission of this reality is quite telling, X.

I am old enough to remember when abortion was illegal in many places, and when it was quite dangerous. Lying to win points? Abortion has always been a legal option for the physician treating the life of the woman, electable if the pregnancy is an imminent threat to her life. Nice try though; you represent your father well ... It is far far safer now that it is legal. No, it is far more deadly ... fewer babies survive the assault and tens-of-millions have been exterminated on your altar of choice, X. In fact, it is safer than bringing a fetus to term and delivering it as a baby. Well, let's see, one out of two who enter an abortionists 'sanctum sanctorum of death' leaves as a dead human being. Hardly what you have tried to characterize, X.

If you will check the problems with delivering babies and the price of mal-practice insurance, obstetric/gynocology doctors are leaving the profession in droves. 'Ahh, but you have the enlightened solution, don't you ghoul, just kill the little ones before they become a nuisance! Yes, you will feel right at home in your final destination, X. (That's what's known as an opinion, pseudo-satre.) In fact, my Mother mentioned in passing and you ought to thank her that she didn't have your attitudes when you were in the embryo age or fetal age, 'cause you're a defender of serial killing. Enough of you. You have a certain stench to you

[XBob]

As you will not take the trouble to answer my questions, I will not take the trouble to answer your foolish accusations, which exactly parellel what the original post is about, and have little weight or integrity and are mostly incorrect, insults, and name calling.

And now you are calling me a liar too!!!

" Lying to win points? Abortion has always been a legal option for the physician treating the life of the woman, electable if the pregnancy is an imminent threat to her life."

You obviously don't remember those times, and the reasons for passing Roe v Wade to begin with - there were many places and states where abortion was illegal, for any reason, period, even to save the life of the mother. You should know better than that. And I have had numbers of people on FR argue that there is no reason, period for an abortion, even to save the mother's life, to save their wife's life, or even to save their own life.

And how can you begin to justify an abortion to save the mother's life, when, as you repeatedly argue, it has exactly the same value as a fertilized egg? What kind of logic is that?

PLEASE GET OFF YOUR HIGH HORSE AND ANSWER MY QUESTIONS !!!!