If you see that as "stalking - harassment - disruption", then I submit that you're not entirely clear on what scientific discussions actually involve. You see, in scientific discussions, people actually get to challenge your statements if they seem inaccurate. If that sort of thing upsets you, perhaps you'd best not participate.
If you call mud dwelling sludge animals - remains precambrian fossils do you think that is ok ?
I mean real fossils of higher species than worms and mollusks !
133 posted on 08/11/2003 12:23 PM PDT by f.Christian
* Something * EVIDENCE of substance - relevance --- REALITY // sanity !
Serious mental problems (( denial // projection )) --- seeing things (( delusians )) !
Could you be so kind as to translate this into ordinary grammatical English? Thanks.
If I catch your drift, however, it appears that you're accusing me of "serious mental problems", "denial", "seeing things", and "delusions" (note correct spelling), all for pointing out that precambrian fossils do actually exist and asking you to cease your repeated untrue declarations that they do not.
If so, please confirm so that I can respond appropriately.