Based on what sample time? Your existance, perhaps 40 years? The eighty years we have had higher-tech instruments to study the stars? The four hundered or so since the invention of the telescope? We are using a much grander timeframe that we have data to support if we are talking about the God-driven forces needed to create stars.
Based on what sample time? Your existance, perhaps 40 years? The eighty years we have had higher-tech instruments to study the stars? The four hundered or so since the invention of the telescope? We are using a much grander timeframe that we have data to support if we are talking about the God-driven forces needed to create stars.
95 years(NGC & IC I&II celestial catalogues)/6000 years = 1.6% of the history of the Universe has man been able to quantify that of which I speak(your numbers, definately not mine). In all that time, I am not aware of a single instance where a new galaxy has suddenly appeared(of course new, further away galaxies are found), as would HAVE to happen if you use Dr Humphreys's matter in the universe is unbounded theory.
I'm not sure what your position is, so it is difficult to point out all of the failings.