Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CyberCowboy777
Sorry Cyber, the $300 checks did not boost the economy, because of the slow economy, uncertainty etc debt reduction was was it was most commonly used for, it didn't stimulate economic growth or job creation.

There is a huge difference between lowering marginal tax rates, and writing refund checks. Or lowering or raising a consumption based tax or a tarriff.... To have the naive belief that all taxes at all times are all equal and all the same in terms of policy at all times is patently rediculous. That is ideological garbage.

Sorry guys, you have offered nothing to support any allegation that Warren Buffet is a bad choice for the role he is being tapped to do. You have offered spin, but no facts. Buffet is definately an A team selection, just like Wilson.



281 posted on 08/15/2003 9:46:00 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
What are you talking about?

Your going to say with a straight face (and against almost all economist) that 45 Billion dollars has no effect on the economy?

And that is just the $300.00 checks. Then we have $400.00 per kid (I got $1,200.00 of my money back, I know those that got $1,600.00) and the Tax cuts.

We have had rebates and cuts, both effecting the economy, with more to come.

You are so concerned with covering for Arnold you have sold out Reaganomics.

Dude! Get your soul back, it aint worth it.
282 posted on 08/15/2003 9:59:33 AM PDT by CyberCowboy777 (They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson