Creationism seminars apparently tell their students to frequently mention punctuated equilibrium as something refuting Darwinism. However, they never seem to tell them what the heck punk-eek is. It does not address abiogenesis at all. Never did, never will. BTW, if you follow the link, Punk-Eek is not Goldsmith's "hopeful monster" theory. (And why do I mention that?)
We on the evo side see the same cookie-cutter output replete with the same shared errors all the time from a stream of seminar posters. It all orginates from a few people at AiG and ICR who are not telling the truth about what evolution even is, or what it predicts, or what the evidence is.
The reason I went to the big bang is because evolutionists do. As I said, I'm perfectly willing to throw that theory out.
"Throw that theory out?" Recognizing that something is unrelated to your argument is not the same as proving it false. Please recognize that Darwin was unaware of any Big Bang. The diversity of life on earth is a later question than the origin of the universe.