[DittoJed2]

Junior, one other thing too. Just consider, not asking you to accept, but just consider the possibility that their millions and billions of years assumptions are not correct. What would the implications be?

[Right Wing Professor]

Junior, one other thing too. Just consider, not asking you to accept, but just consider the possibility that their millions and billions of years assumptions are not correct.

Those are not assumptions. They are the conclusions of the analysis of a large body of radioactive decay evidence.

[Junior]

Nothing. If, however you found a T-Rex skeleton over 200 million years old, you'd definitely stir up some news.

[Ichneumon]

Just consider, not asking you to accept, but just consider the possibility that their millions and billions of years assumptions are not correct. What would the implications be?

That would depend, of course: "not correct" in what way?

Also, they are not "assumptions", they are the results of may independent kinds of tests and analysis. You keep describing these findings as if they were merely unfounded presumptions. They most certainly are not.