[VadeRetro]

What it says is that classical Darwinianism did not deliver on the answers to an evolutionary scientist's questions, did not show what it promised, so this fellow (or fellows) had to come up with a revised theory to try to explain the record.

Science is about understanding the world. It adjusts to new evidence as needed. That it does so makes it different from religion.

Science hasn't gone back to ascribing real-world phenomena to the actions of magical beings. Ascribing things to magical beings will be wrong forever.

[DittoJed2]

I repeat, the very fact that there are so many theories of evolution shows that the record is not as clear as the dogmatists would have us believe.

[balrog666]

Wow, I can't believe y'all are still talking to this troll!