[DittoJed2]

Well, balrog666 just added Menton's name to the list as someone with impecable credentials who is belittled (personally) by the evolution crowd. I revise the post where I say he wasn't attacked. Because he did an experiment with a modern reptile (not the only reason he has for disbelieving scales can become feathers) he is called an "idiot." How nice.

[AndrewC]

Please be aware that many of us are checking off many boxes concerning behavior and attitude from lists established prior to a certain date. The pattern looks very much the same.

[balrog666]

Well, balrog666 just added Menton's name to the list as someone with impecable credentials who is belittled (personally) by the evolution crowd. I revise the post where I say he wasn't attacked. Because he did an experiment with a modern reptile (not the only reason he has for disbelieving scales can become feathers) he is called an "idiot." How nice.

His first response to the question of ancient feathers, dinosaurs, and Archaeopteryx is to look at modern bird feathers and shed snake scales and to conclude that they are not similar.

Well, duh!

This "conclusion" has nothing to with the original question except to provide a scientific sounding excuse to dismiss it out of hand. His statements following that statement have even less to do with anything relevent to the original question. Clearly, as a scientist, his best days are long behind him.