To: concisetraveler
LOL what you call "evidence" some would call redundant arguments of circular reasoning. If "some" could make an actual case that circular reasoning was truly involved, I would admit that the observations should not count as supporting evidence.
Until then, however, unsupported labeling does not affect the validity of the evidence.
Abraham Lincoln: "If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have?" Audience member: "Five."
Lincoln: "No, four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one."
To: Ichneumon
Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it one
Those are the most illuminated words you have said.
To: Ichneumon
If "some" could make an actual case that circular reasoning was truly involved, I would admit that the observations should not count as supporting evidence.
How is the age of a fossil determined?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson