It's a conceptual model of the operation of a subset of the universe - it doesn't judge people. Try to overcome the bias of your own belief system and view the world through someone else's eyes - you'll never understand them without trying.
There are implications to when you tell people they are no better than animals, and repercussions to a system of belief without moral foundation.
I didn't say that - that's your strawman based on a poor understanding of what science is.
Again, I sure hope you aren't pro-life. Because having someone who is a Darwinist stand up and say why life is valuable would not e very persuasive.
Total non-sequitur. I would not base such an argument on the "value" of life - that's your strawman based on your belief system.
Me: However, we are more specialized than other hominids towards a larger brain, unimpeded voice box, and bipedal stance.
You: Okay, a "Favored" race. How's that? That is how Darwin worded it. It also shows that you do not understand Darwin.
Where did I say that we weren't? You sure like to jump to unwarranted conclusions. Try to stop and think before you post next time.
No strawman. You can not have it to where it makes no moral judgments.
Really? Show me an example. What moral judgements does the Theory of Gravity make?
Me: On the contrary, as Junior has pointed out several times, both the individual instinct and the cultural basis for survival, reproduction, and the protection of one's children, impose such judgements. And for clearly rational and easily understandable reasons.
You: Baloney.
Allow me to rephrase that. Most 5th graders would understand that.
Saying they are less than human, which is what I was referring to, absolves them of responsibility more than allowing demons to control them.
Simple enough. Define "human" then. Explain why they are "less than human" (there's that high/low strawman again).