[Dante3]

By not discriminating against ones sexual orientation, does this mean that we have to accept pedophiles?

[sarasmom]

That is certainly next, isnt it?
It seems we are not to be "allowed" to have any societal controlls on deviant behavior at all.
Are liberals anarchists? Or are they just too stupid to understand that societies exist only because the individuals who partake of them agree to a certain range of acceptable behavior?
What next, will the Amish have to rent their barns to transvestites?
Will Baptist churches have to rent their halls for sexual orgies?
Sexual behavior is a private choice.
Once that choice is made public, it is certainly the right of the public to tolerate or disdain from associating with the practicioner of abnormal sexual behavior.
People dont get to choose their color,sex, or nation of origin.I happen to believe religion is an adult choice, but lay that one aside for a moment.
Whether or not abnormal sexual orientation is genetic or learned behavior is really a moot point.
Sexual behavior is a choice.One can choose to be sexually active or not.The resulting choice has both private and public consequences.Make the choice public, and enjoy the consequences of societal approval or disapproval.