[TheOtherOne]

Moore's opponents aren't suing him to add their own images in, but rather to supress his freedom of expression.

The intentions of Moore's opponents are not the issue. His refusal to allow other images is what makes his case and argument legally distingishable from just his right to have a display. That point is not at issue, at issue is his right to display only his chosen religius symbols and exclude all others - that is what Moore is fighting for. That is unAmerican

[Southack]

"His refusal to allow other images is what makes his case and argument legally distingishable from just his right to have a display. That point is not at issue, at issue is his right to display only his chosen religius symbols and exclude all others - that is what Moore is fighting for."

Moore is entitled to his own tastes in decoration. Your initial point might be valid if he was denying others their rights to freely express their religions in areas in which they are entitled, but as for the building in question, only Moore has the authority to decorate it.