[.cnI redruM]

Susan Estrich is working for Boozamonte these days. Although, she does give Arianna a well-deserved carpet-whacking.

[Chemnitz]

This is the second time I have agreed with Susan Estrogen. I loved her column on the Clintons.

[mombonn]

The ease with which she has taken Hollywood by storm is an embarrassing confirmation of the shallowness of my hometown.

Why does Susan single arianna out???? Most of the candidates she supports and defends are equally shallow, hypocritical, and self-serving.

[DoctorZIn]

PING!

Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin.

[alwaysconservative]

Is she really working for the Big Boob? What a disappointment! I actually find Estrich to be one of the more honest and entertaining voices on the left; she calls 'em as she sees 'em. (Please don't flame me, that's just my opinion; even when I disagree with her, I usually find her likeable.) Sometimes, the way she talks, I think she is taking baby steps towards conservatism, especially the part about the 'toons "sucking the air" out of all the Democrats' campaigns.

[bedolido]

just to remind everyone what the author looks like... sorry to ruin your lunch.

[ozzymandus]

I have to admit an occasional agreement with Ms. Estrogen. She nailed the klintons and was blacklisted by the leftie editors for it, and in this column she calls bill maher a liberal, while he claims to be a "libertarian". Her honesty really honks off the RATs. But she's still hard to look at.

[nickcarraway]

ping

[Orangedog]

She is running on a platform she didn't even believe in a few years ago. Nor is it one she lives by. How could she do that to her children? my own children ask. In Huffington's case, of course, it may be a bit more complicated than that, financially speaking, since it's slightly more difficult to live off your children's child support when your children aren't living with you.

I made a prediction last week that the "Huffington for governor" story about how she only paid $700 in taxes would get spiked because most of her income was "child" support. And aside from this one article today, thats pretty much been the case.

[truthkeeper]

Tsk-tsk...Susan, Susan. What's gotten into you lately?
(I loved it.)