Skip to comments.
Say It Ain't So, Bud (Pete Rose Alert)
fanstop.com ^
| 08/20/2003
| Adam Graham
Posted on 08/22/2003 10:12:15 AM PDT by Keyes2000mt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: ianincali
I admit--Pujols is one of the 5 best hitters I've ever seen since I've watched baseball for the past 40 years (the others: Bonds, Rice, Carew, and Molitor). But to me, this year Bonds has a pretty clear edge, and what he did against the Braves this week proves it.
21
posted on
08/22/2003 11:12:20 AM PDT
by
Remole
To: Az Joe
IMHO, Rose will never bet on baseball if he is reinstated, because he will be under such scrutiny, that betting will be virtually impossible for him to get away with.How would you ever know if he did? Hmmm? He was the MANAGER for crying out loud! He pulls a pitcher here, fails to insert a pinch hitter there, calls for a steal when there isn't a prayer -- voila, he coaches his team right out of a game -- possibly winning a bet in the process! C'mon THINK IT ALL THE WAY THROUGH!
22
posted on
08/22/2003 11:12:24 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Just taking life with a grain of salt....oh, and a slice of lime and a shot of tequila...)
To: Tallguy
Wrong guy. But I say let him back in anyway.
23
posted on
08/22/2003 11:14:04 AM PDT
by
Az Joe
To: ianincali
IMHO, Rose will never bet on baseball if he is reinstated, because he will be under such scrutiny, that betting will be virtually impossible for him to get away with."A Rose is a Rose is a Rose."
To: Godzilla
There's no rule posted in clubhouses saying drug use leads to an automatic ban. Betting on the game, threatens the integrity of the game itself.
To: Godzilla
Its interesting how on many aspects Rose is being dumped upon. However, when compared to the multiple drug convictions many players have acquired and the damage they have caused to baseball with the gross lack of any similar punishment make Rose's ban very unfair.Fair point, but you realize that this is the "Bill Clinton" defense? You can only address problems 1 at a time, as they are discovered.
Who was that Dodger pitcher that suffered several suspensions for drug use, only to be re-instated every time? Bad, I agree. Worse than Rose? Maybe, but we can't go back & correct that decision. The reason I can't remember that pitcher's name is because nobody is nominating him to the HOF, so I guess it's a mute point.
26
posted on
08/22/2003 11:17:58 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Just taking life with a grain of salt....oh, and a slice of lime and a shot of tequila...)
To: Remole
How about all the drunks, racists, drug and steroid users? How about the owners who have done more to hurt the game then Rose ever did?
Do you mind having them on the field?
27
posted on
08/22/2003 11:19:16 AM PDT
by
Az Joe
To: Keyes2000mt
This same info was posted last week and MLB eventually said that it was a rumor.
Mike Schmidt said something in the Cincy Enquirer about Pete getting a hearing sometime during the off season.
That's a far cry from winning his case.
Personally, I think he should be in the HoF as a player. (He doesn't have the wins to justify being in as a manager, but that's a moot point. His gambling as a manager should disqualify him if he ever gets that far.)
28
posted on
08/22/2003 11:22:42 AM PDT
by
xzins
(In the Beginning was the Word)
To: Keyes2000mt
"Betting on the game, threatens the integrity of the game itself."And corking the bat doesn't?
29
posted on
08/22/2003 11:25:35 AM PDT
by
Hatteras
(I've got to stop wishin', got to go fishin'...)
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
To: ianincali
Oh, I agree. But, I'm insinuating that even if Selig raised the ban, HOF still doesn't have to allow him in.
To: ianincali
On the overvalued reputation of the RBI stat, see the work of Neyer and James over at ESPN and at Sabermetrics. They would say that RBI is not very important; much more important are On-base %, Slugging % and the composite of them.
32
posted on
08/22/2003 11:30:58 AM PDT
by
Remole
To: Remole
If Rose is reinstated to Professional Baseball, I will never again attend a Major League Game. That would be the end for me. Ill be sure not to look for you at any Reds game then.
33
posted on
08/22/2003 11:33:13 AM PDT
by
smith288
('This time I think the Americans are serious. Bush is not like Clinton.' - Uday Hussein)
To: ianincali
"How about Bonds take off the elbow pad that no one else gets to wear?"Who says no one else can wear an elbow pad?
34
posted on
08/22/2003 11:36:04 AM PDT
by
Hatteras
(I've got to stop wishin', got to go fishin'...)
To: Tallguy
"Fair point, but you realize that this is the "Bill Clinton" defense? You can only address problems 1 at a time, as they are discovered."
Not intended as a slick willie defense, just to point out that there is a significant degree of unsavoryness with the way pro baseball deals with a lot of issues, one of which is the drug issues and the kid glove treatment handed out. And it has been more than "one dodger pitcher" but many from other teams, including potential HOF player (or at least they would have been w/o drugs). Rose gambled and did wrong. And of course this isn't limited to just baseball either.
35
posted on
08/22/2003 11:38:19 AM PDT
by
Godzilla
(If you're living like there's no hell - you'd better be right.)
To: Tallguy
It was Steve Howe.
36
posted on
08/22/2003 11:40:59 AM PDT
by
Mrs.Liberty
("Oh people, this is freedom! "...Liberated Iraqi man, 09 APR 2003)
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: Az Joe
MLB Does not have a rule that if you cork your bat, do drugs, drink too much or even murder your mother that you will be banned from the game for Life. However, MLB does have a rule that if you bet on baseball that you will be banned from the game for Life. Pete bet on baseball, Pet broke the rules, Pete should take his punishment like a man.
To: Godzilla
Drug use v. Gambling is an "Apples 'n Oranges" comparison that just distracts attention from the question at hand: Should Pete Rose be reinstated? My answer would be 'no'.
BTW, Baseball has to be careful when disciplining players ever since the advent of the players' union. The concept of collective bargaining means that there's virtually no action that MLB (the commissioners office) can take against a player that will not be reviewed (and possibly arbitrated). Plus you run the risk of one of these players suing MLB for "denying him a right to make a living." MLB would lose that one in a heartbeat.
39
posted on
08/22/2003 11:50:37 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
(Just taking life with a grain of salt....oh, and a slice of lime and a shot of tequila...)
To: ianincali
>>>>>>"It's in compliance," Watson said. "He's got a medical exemption." <<<<
Yea, that pad prolly covers up where he sticks himslef with the steriod needle.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson