To: Keyes2000mt
Its interesting how on many aspects Rose is being dumped upon. However, when compared to the multiple drug convictions many players have acquired and the damage they have caused to baseball with the gross lack of any similar punishment make Rose's ban very unfair. I cannot condone his actions, but baseball has a higher volume of equally damaging players they need to deal seriously with.
20 posted on
08/22/2003 11:09:04 AM PDT by
Godzilla
(If you're living like there's no hell - you'd better be right.)
To: Godzilla
There's no rule posted in clubhouses saying drug use leads to an automatic ban. Betting on the game, threatens the integrity of the game itself.
To: Godzilla
Its interesting how on many aspects Rose is being dumped upon. However, when compared to the multiple drug convictions many players have acquired and the damage they have caused to baseball with the gross lack of any similar punishment make Rose's ban very unfair.Fair point, but you realize that this is the "Bill Clinton" defense? You can only address problems 1 at a time, as they are discovered.
Who was that Dodger pitcher that suffered several suspensions for drug use, only to be re-instated every time? Bad, I agree. Worse than Rose? Maybe, but we can't go back & correct that decision. The reason I can't remember that pitcher's name is because nobody is nominating him to the HOF, so I guess it's a mute point.
26 posted on
08/22/2003 11:17:58 AM PDT by
Tallguy
(Just taking life with a grain of salt....oh, and a slice of lime and a shot of tequila...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson