Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

France demands international force for Iraq
The Independent (U.K.) ^ | 08/23/03 | Andrew Buncombe

Posted on 08/22/2003 2:26:33 PM PDT by Pokey78

France dismissed an effort by the US to get more countries to provide troops for Iraq yesterday, saying an international force should be dispatched only if it had a UN mandate.

At the end of a week in which over 23 people were killed by a bomb attack on the UN's Baghdad offices, France's Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin, whose country has veto power in the Security Council, said the Allies must switch from "a logic of occupation to a logic of sovereignty", telling Le Monde: "We can't make do with adjusting or enlarging the current plan. The right thing would be to bring into play a true international force under the mandate of the UN.."

His sentiments were echoed by UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, who warned the Security Council would be unlikely to support a new UN resolution to send more troops to Iraq unless the US shared responsibilities. After a meeting with Jack Straw, the UK's Foreign Secretary, he said the council could consider an international force if it involved "not just burden-sharing but also sharing decisions and responsibility".

Mr Straw, an advocate of greater UN involvement, said despite different starting points on the matter, a "strong consensus" was possible.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: france; iraq; multinational; nonallyfrance; rebuildingiraq; un; unresolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2003 2:26:33 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Wait. Didn't Rumsfield hear from his commanders in the field that their force levels were adequate? If not, why is the Bush administration looking for foreign troops?
2 posted on 08/22/2003 2:27:48 PM PDT by KantianBurke (The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
in other news the UN demands an investigation into France's recent mass deaths of its elderly....is it the final solution for France's snowballing socialism bill?
3 posted on 08/22/2003 2:28:49 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"not just burden-sharing but also sharing decisions and responsibility".

Let the Franks show us how it's done. Give them Tikrit.

4 posted on 08/22/2003 2:29:12 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
If not, why is the Bush administration looking for foreign troops?

So some of our guys can come home...

5 posted on 08/22/2003 2:29:56 PM PDT by SunStar (Democrats piss me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Texas: "It's Bigger than Fance"
6 posted on 08/22/2003 2:30:23 PM PDT by TRY ONE (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
France is in no position to demand anything. Plus I hear their residents can't stand hot weather. Sissies!
7 posted on 08/22/2003 2:31:12 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
France....demands..... hee hee hee. Puh-lease.
8 posted on 08/22/2003 2:31:21 PM PDT by kimmie7 (I need more time, more coffee, and more bandwidth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
France should have thought about that before threatening a veto many moons ago...
9 posted on 08/22/2003 2:31:44 PM PDT by kevkrom (This tag line for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
France demands?

les permettre de mange le gâteau,that's close,I think.

10 posted on 08/22/2003 2:32:56 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
So, they demand that action be taken! What will their vote be, when the crunch time comes? The US should draft a resolution post-haste, seeing if the nations will support it or not. I wonder if a lot of those nations making noise publicly will actually vote supporting such a resolution?
11 posted on 08/22/2003 2:33:00 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife ("Life isn't fair. It's fairer than death, is all.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
If we need more international presence why not call on NATO!

France wouldn't even receive an invitation to the meeting.
12 posted on 08/22/2003 2:33:25 PM PDT by Republican Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
France : Shut up and buy air conditioners ... we're busy saving the world.
13 posted on 08/22/2003 2:35:55 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
As usual the Bush administration is listening to the State Department types and going to beg at the UN again.

This is embarasing. if we need more troops, we should send our own. If we don't have enough, expand the Army. But begging others for troops gives them the chance to rub our nose in the dirt.
14 posted on 08/22/2003 2:36:24 PM PDT by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
France should have thought about that before threatening a veto many moons ago...

Well, the fools thought their veto threat might deter U.S. action, indicative of inflated self worth on their part. Hell, Dubya straight up told 'em we were going with or without them, and the ninnies didn't believe him. If the idiots had gotten on board to begin with we wouldn't be having this discussion now.

15 posted on 08/22/2003 2:36:38 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
France demands international force for Iraq

LibKill laughs at France.

Stupid frogs.

16 posted on 08/22/2003 2:38:59 PM PDT by LibKill (Obligatory Tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The US demands to know why France, a third world country which had a national emergency because the temperature went up for a few days, is still a permanent member of the Security Council when it's relevance on the world scene died on the battlefield at Waterloo.
17 posted on 08/22/2003 2:39:11 PM PDT by medscribe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
The UN had apparently refused to have US troops guard the UN headquarters and that is where the problem arose. The UN was using Iraq security forces which were in place under Saddam.
18 posted on 08/22/2003 2:40:35 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunStar; KantianBurke
KantianBurke: Wait. Didn't Rumsfield hear from his commanders in the field that their force levels were adequate? If not, why is the Bush administration looking for foreign troops?

SunStar: So some of our guys can come home...

Sunstar, if you're right, that's proof positive of inadequate troop levels. Time to step up recruiting.

19 posted on 08/22/2003 2:42:03 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dinok
I don't think we need anymore of our combat soldiers policing the streets in Iraq. If France wants to send some pawns over there, let them pay for it too.
20 posted on 08/22/2003 2:42:12 PM PDT by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson