Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/25/2003 6:54:43 PM PDT by webber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: webber
What an incredible piece. Very thought provoking. Great find and post!
2 posted on 08/25/2003 7:07:12 PM PDT by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
The Federalist noted the remarkable parallel between bishops in the Episcopal Church who "interpret" Scripture to comport with their political and social agendas in violation of their ordinal vows, and judges who "interpret" the Constitution to comport with their political and social agendas, in violation of their oath to uphold our nation's legal foundation. Neither interpretation honors the original word and intent of those founding texts. Instead, they offer nothing more than a reflection of themselves as if they authored those venerable words.

Noooooooooooooooo kidding!

3 posted on 08/25/2003 7:42:45 PM PDT by Cold Heat (Nothing in my home is French!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
William Pryor has acknowledge that Judge Moore's interpretation of the 1st Amendment is correct. He has also vowed to uphold the supreme law of the land.

What is the supreme law of the land? Of course, it's the Constitution.

Therefore, when he says that the Federal Court is WRONG about the 1st Amendment, he is saying that they are wrong about the supreme law of the land.

But, who does he say should be followed in this case? He says we should follow the federal judge who ruled RATHER THAN the supreme law of the land.

Therefore, WHO does Pryor actually think is the supreme law of the land?

He believes in the judges. Not in the Constitution.

I don't care now if Pryor gets filibustered by the US Senate. This case has shown him to be another trojan horse, another Sandra Day O'Conner.
4 posted on 08/25/2003 7:53:15 PM PDT by xzins (In the Beginning was the Word)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
Justice Moore -- -- will prepare a new petition to the U.S. Supreme Court "to resolve clearly our inalienable rights to acknowledge God under the First Amendment."



This right has never been at issue.

Moore, Keyes, and hundreds of other politicians have been cynically brewing up a tempest in a teapot.

No ones rights have been violated, and Moores efforts to be the souths foremost interior decorator have been rejected.

This too will pass.
5 posted on 08/25/2003 8:12:24 PM PDT by tpaine ( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
SPOTREP
6 posted on 08/25/2003 9:15:02 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: webber
Here is the Ron Paul speech in front of the House and following thread. The reaction is disturbing.



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/967940/posts
7 posted on 08/25/2003 10:35:28 PM PDT by At _War_With_Liberals (If Hillary ever takes the oath of office, she will be the last President the US will ever have. -RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson