To: ninenot
Let's say you're right.
Whether I agree in all things with Schwarzenegger or not, I disagree in every instance with Davis and Bustamante. I'll vote for Schwarzenegger rather and see Davis
or Bustamante hold the office.
While I agree that it would be better if the things you mentioned were addressed, if McClintock can't get elected they won't be no matter what.
To: DoughtyOne
While I agree that it would be better if the things you mentioned were addressed, if McClintock can't get elected they won't be no matter what. No kidding about McClintock. CA is just too moderate for him.. and so ppl won't vote for him. I will vote for Arnold because he had to work hard to get where he is now. I don't mind that he has never held public office b4... its good to have "new blood" in government. I have had enough of these dolts that keep getting re-elected and long time politicians. gaaaaaaaa
120 posted on
08/26/2003 12:09:12 PM PDT by
teeples
(A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Sir Winston Churchill)
To: DoughtyOne
What is this fascination with McClintock all about?
He seems rather arrogant and aloof, and his tactics of overtly criticizing other Republicans are also very NON-Reagan-like.
He reminds me of Paul Tsongas, clearly the most qualified of the field of Democrats in '92, but he could never connect with the people, he seemed to feel above us all.
McClintock's similar approach will not sell in California. I lived there a long time, have many relatives and friends there now, and another candidate with no charisma after Davis just is not going to prevail, whether a liberal or a conservative. Arnold's enthusiasm will inspire more voters, and his "common man" approach (a fantasy now, but he did achieve his financial success on his own) will probably resonate with many from both ends of the spectrum. And he does have a developing plan. He's been a candidate for less than 3 weeks, and everyone expects him 100% on message. Not very realistic.
Republicans need to win, and purity of principles seems as hopeless in Calif. as in New York and New Jersey. And the Republican party IS an inclusive one.
Some of you would have it down to 2 or 3 members, with those (other than yourselves) suspect as well.
If you fragment the party then we will end up like many nations of the world, multiple parties having to form coaltions to gain power. And that is ALL about compromise. The last thing you seem to want.
137 posted on
08/26/2003 12:21:58 PM PDT by
BonnieJ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson