Replies

It's interesting that Hillary couldn't allege that there was actually any serious air quality problem, or that there was a real solution in any case, as you point out.

She doesn't really care about the substantive issue, she is obviously just looking for a way to poke W in the eye, get her mug out there, and score points with the [primary-voting?] Dems.

Yeah, I could not listen to the whole interview... the bill for replacement television tubes gets cumbersome.

But from what I heard she was shrieking along the lines of a conspiracy in the days immediately after 9/11. She wants to know who in the whitehouse told the 'experts' at the epa to sweeten up their report regarding carcenogens in the air immediately after the collapse of the WTC. She wants to start a congressional witch hunt or something.

That was when I shut off the tv rather than toss it out the window. Because everyone knew that there was a problem lingering in the air... but there was nothing that could be done about it short of causing a panic and leaving the WTC as a pile of rubble for another year.

If the report had come out negative like she is alleging it should have, it would have caused larger problems. So if shrillery couldnt complain about the LACK of a report... she would have complained because there WAS a report. Of course Matt Loser wouldnt ask her any tough questions, so I didnt bother waiting for them.

Intelligent and responsible voters will reach these obvious conclusions.

This is an old complaint of hers, simply ramped up now as the media searches for ways to bash the President.

There was no solution to the problem of air quality but the elites just can't bring themselves to blame the terrorists.