Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HurkinMcGurkin
You aren't going to get a lot of even-handed commentary on this case by asking on these threads. You've probably already guessed that.

Just FYI, this thing has been dragging up and down through both the state and Federal court system for more than a decade. It has been to the state supreme court three times, and to the SCOTUS once (which refused even to hear the case). Last winter, Mrs. Schiavo was examined by a panel of physicians: two appointed by her husband, two appointed by her parents, and one appointed by the judge. Predictably, the four doctors appointed by parties to the case supported the position of the side that hired them. The physician chosen by the judge sided with the husband, and found that Mrs. Schiavo is in a persistent vegetative state, with no expectation that she will ever recover.

In summary, this case has been winding its way through the court system for a very long time. It is standard practice in (so far as I know) every state in the union that when a patient is unable to make decisions for herself, and has left no written instructions as to her wishes, the closest living relative is called upon to make those judgments, in consultation with her physicians. In the course of 10 years of court battles, Mrs. Schialvo's parents have failed to persuade any judge, anywhere, either state or Federal, that Mr. Schialvo is not acting appropriately in his wife's best interest. And despite the allegations circulating about foul play, they have failed to persuade any prosecutor's office that there is reason to believe that a crime has been committed or is being committed.

That's about as good a summary of the situation as you're going to get.

66 posted on 08/28/2003 3:09:41 PM PDT by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Brandon
Bump
67 posted on 08/28/2003 3:49:09 PM PDT by kimmie7 (I need more time, more coffee, and more bandwidth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Brandon
You're leaving out far too many inconvenient details, Brandon. It isn't a "case" - Terri's a person, a human being. Have you bothered to watch the video? The court-appointed doctors claim Terri's reponse to stimuli is 'reflex' - her own mother SEES her daughter respond. Thirteen other doctors disagreed with the doctors who claimed there was no hope. Others who have been in similar states - and recovered - are fighting for Terri, too.

Sorry, there is no second chance here. If this Judge and this husband aren't weighing all evidence - Terri has no hope.

The Governor can pardon a condemned murderer on death row. Terri, helpless and innocent, gets no independent guardian? No one's keeping her husband from divorcing her. NO ONE. Her own mother wants to care for her. Where is the justice?

79 posted on 08/28/2003 4:36:56 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl (Rummy to Rats, 8/21* This much is certain: their cause is lost. That regime will not be coming back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Brandon
I'm guessing that you haven't kept up with the "fine points" of this case, such as the evidence filed earlier today in federal court:

"When is that bitch gonna die?"

Yeah, I guess eating jello with a spoon doesn't count, since she wasn't the one holding the spoon.

Paging Christopher Reeve...

402 posted on 08/31/2003 1:15:08 AM PDT by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson