[Jorge]

AndrewC;No. You are the one asserting that the presence of a stone in a state building somehow is a law establishing a religion.

Jorge"Wrong. I never said such a thing in any of my posts."

AndrewC;Isn't the following your statement?
"The law Judge Moore defied was one dictating that NO ONE has the right to use the Govt to impose their religion on others."

Of course it's my statement.

But nowhere do I state that *defying a law* is the same as creating a new "law establishing a religion."

My statement says that Judge Moore was abusing his position in Govt to impose his religion on others. You don't need to create a law to do this.

[AndrewC]

My statement says that Judge Moore was abusing his position in Govt to impose his religion on others. You don't need to create a law to do this.

Then tell me the mechanism. You have not even named the religion. The only thing Moore has done is place that stone. Now you are the one asserting an imposition. Please elucidate.