Arnold Supporters- need your help

ArnoldGovernor.net ^ | 8.29.2003 | Jagrmeister

[CyberCowboy777]

No, this is what makes you look intolerant and despicible.

Your the one calling Tom supporter evil and stupid! What a joke. Intolerant? Have you read your own posts?

Thank you for proving my point.

[68 grunt]

No, no, no, you misunderstand. I'm calling you that! I'm calling all of your intolerant ilk that! McC is a good man, and would make a fine gov, but it ain't gonna happen, and all y'all vitriol is gonna do is help senor bustamecha. Your incredibly weak points are embarrassingly apparent every time you post.

[68 grunt]

No, no, no, you misunderstand. I'm calling you that! I'm calling all of your intolerant ilk that! McC is a good man, and would make a fine gov, but it ain't gonna happen, and all y'all vitriol is gonna do is help senor bustamecha. Your incredibly weak points are embarrassingly apparent every time you post.

[68 grunt]

Hi Cathryn, did you get your marching orders from mrs grayout this morning?

[CyberCowboy777]

No, I understand perfectly. You are intolerant.

You are the one posting that Tom supporters are stupid, dumb as rocks, Idiots. That Social conservatives are worse than Liberals.

Weak points? Like calling people I disagree with Idiots and Evil?

You are your own worse fear. You are seeing the bogey man, but you don't realize your looking in the mirror.

[Cathryn Crawford]

Who's that?

[Happy2BMe]

" I despise you for what you are doing to our party, our cause and our country. You're intolerant and narrowminded, hateful and vindictive, rude and intemperate, hostile yet cowardly. Bah!"

Say - in reference to "our" party.

I've been a Republican for a mere 35 years (still wet behind the ears).

And you?

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

If you don't think that McClintock Supporters are wacked out zealots, take a look at the keywords.

[68 grunt]

Republican since 1970. Only voted dim twice, gov moonbeam and the peanut farmer. Man, never again! Big dang mistakes! I also voted for Ronnie, as the gub and as the prez. I see a lot of Ronnie in Arnie.

Go Arnie!

[68 grunt]

... If you don't think that McClintock Supporters are wacked out zealots, take a look at the keywords.

I hadn't paid attention to that, thanks for bringing it to my attention. Dang!

[68 grunt]

Who's that?

Well, Sharon Davis, to be sure. Her leaked memo, advising dims to attack Arnie. Wonder why they're not concerned with McC?

[tame]

Do they call him "The Terminator" because he is a pro-abort?

Yep. He's as pro-death as any Nazi. Pro-gay marriage (no matter what he told Hannity. After all, isnt that, in effect, what "civil unions" are?)

[CyberCowboy777]

What I do not understand is how this has gotten so out of hand. I am being called evil for supporting Tom while supporting Arnold if Cruz looks to win.

As if those who support Tom are Evil? Stupid? Idiots? Hateful? Vindictive?

This is childish and shameful.

[Happy2BMe]

"Republican since 1970. Only voted dim twice, gov moonbeam and the peanut farmer. Man, never again! Big dang mistakes! I also voted for Ronnie, as the gub and as the prez. I see a lot of Ronnie in Arnie."

Well, our political affiliations and pedigrees are very similar.

I forgive the Ron Brown and Jimmy Carter moments of weakness. . .

One must remember that the "Old Republican Party" would never have survived to this day had it not been for the untoiling efforts of millions of Christians who kept it afloat during the past fifty-year reign of Democrats.

Just a friendly little reminder of where the roots came from, bro!

(Thanks for you service in Nam - and to America!)

[68 grunt]

You are so dim. The dumb as rocks quote was in direct reference to the other duf's tagline. Dooh! Yes, I am percieving you as weakminded, dim and representing evil. You go through life scared and inhibited. You talk of boogeymen because you are afraid of boogeymen. And a pi$$ poor writer on top of it.

You said "Like calling people I disagree with Idiots and Evil?" I don't call people that disagree with you either idiots, nor evil. I reserve those thoughts for you and your ilk. Yep, of your ilk I'm intolerant, sick to death of it, and had enough. I'm gonna call your spade as I see it. You're gonna have to deal with that perception. You don't care, I know. Thats part of the reason I perceive you as so dim, you don't realize just how your intolerant type chase good people away.

[CyberCowboy777]

I am a wacked out zealot?

I did not put up those keywords? For all you know one childish person did all those.

What exactly have I said to make me a wacked out zealot? What position have I taken that deems me mentally unstable and a zealot?

What is going on. Why so much hate? I am a person who has worked on the same issue you have. I have written the same newspapers, made the same phone calls. I have agreed and disagreed with my fellow FReepers. That is the point, to debate to hash out ideas.

Now suddenly if I don't full on support Arnold I am a zealot?

[68 grunt]

... One must remember that the "Old Republican Party" would never have survived to this day had it not been for the untoiling efforts of millions of Christians who kept it afloat during the past fifty-year reign of Democrats.</>

Yes, and (believe it or not), my bagging is kind of hurting me, because I know so many good Christians, who are tolerant and loving, are being tarred with my same brushstrokes. I wish I could fix that because I do feel the Jesus'es messege was the most perfect ever delivered.

[CyberCowboy777]

What is my ilk?

Post a quote of my intolerance.

[68 grunt]

Not because you don't support Arnie, but because you are rabid in you offense. Droolingly rabid.

[Tamzee]

I'm not quite sure why you directed this at me, it's obvious you haven't been reading my posts throughout the Arnold threads. I would rather have McClintock, but believe backing Arnold is our only chance of seeing ANY conservative values enacted in CA. My posts have only promoted Arnold and attempted to correct deliberate misinformation posted about him by supposed fellow Republicans. I also haven't posted one negative item about McClintock and am looking forward to wholeheartedly supporting his candidacy in a future race... hopefully as a future Senator of California where he can be a fantastic benefit to the entire country :-)

The interesting thing about this FR debate is that most Arnold supporters admire McClintock and don't want to see him damaged at all for the good of the GOP. From what I've been seeing, however, while most McClintock supporters are principled, passionate and dedicated to truth in ideals, there are a very vocal bunch willing to smear and outright lie about a front-running Republican candidate because he isn't conservative enough for them. Cute strategy, damaging to the GOP, and, yes, tactics more worthy of DU-ers.

There are shrills on both sides and it needs to stop because it hurts all of our future goals, but there far many more trashing Arnold and using scummy tactics to do so.