Skip to comments.
Time for the Terminator to step forward and answer detailed questions about his past conduct
LA Weekly ^
| 8-29
| Nikki Finke
Posted on 08/29/2003 10:27:25 PM PDT by ambrose
Edited on 08/30/2003 7:06:15 AM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-362 next last
To: ambrose
In an interview with the L.A. Weekly, the Los Angeles lawyer and feminist who is founder and president of the Womens Equal Rights Legal Defense and Education Fund added her outrage to what inexplicably has yet to become a real controversy over the candidates sexual history and attitudes.
----------------------
Did she object to such things in Bill Clinton?
21
posted on
08/29/2003 10:46:53 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: RLK
In an interview with the L.A. Weekly, the Los Angeles lawyer and feminist who is founder and president of the Womens Equal Rights Legal Defense and Education Fund added her outrage to what inexplicably has yet to become a real controversy over the candidates sexual history and attitudes.
---------------------- Did she object to such things in Bill Clinton?
DING DING DING! You broke-a da code! No more calls, we have a winner!
22
posted on
08/29/2003 10:47:56 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: Mr. Mojo
One of the silliest, nastiest sows of the last 100 years. Calls to mind another pest (Jesse Jackson) and the appropriate response: 1. Laugh at. 2. Ignore.
23
posted on
08/29/2003 10:48:41 PM PDT
by
185JHP
( "All not actually on watch, lay to your racks...")
To: Mr. Mojo
Gloria Allred..I am disgusted, appalled, revolted, sickened, disturbed and troubled,....Allred said, The answer is absolutely. Who a person is, their character, their history, their treatment of women, matters because, although a person can change, we have a right to know what their behavior has been in the past. pssst, gloria, remember juanita?? or Kathleen??
That sentiment was echoed by Toni Broaddus, program director for Equality California, the statewide gay-rights group
Quite a collection of people slowly and surely supporting mclintock for gov. Why?
24
posted on
08/29/2003 10:50:36 PM PDT
by
going hot
(Happiness is a momma deuce)
To: F16Fighter
IF they were, they wouldn't have elected a rapist-coke snorting-gangster from Arkansas TWICE to be President. It was awful when Democrats used the "Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged" jargon when defending Clinton. I find it worrisome that some Republicans are using it to defend a guy who boasts about "gang-bangs."
To: ambrose
(witness todays water-cooler talk about Britney tongue-kissing Madonna at the MTV Video Awards.) Another sign of end-times? Yuck.
I wonder if she's getting back at Justin?
Oh yeah, Arnold just went up in polling among Dems 24 percentage points.
26
posted on
08/29/2003 10:52:30 PM PDT
by
dasboot
(Celebrate UNITY!)
To: Poohbah
Did she object to such things in Bill Clinton?
DING DING DING! You broke-a da code! No more calls, we have a winner!
No we don't. Gloria did denounce Clinton's activities with Monica, but being a loyal democrat, she stopped waaaaaay short of voicing her support for impeachment because "lying about sex didn't merit impeachment."
27
posted on
08/29/2003 10:53:55 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
To: onyx
No we don't. Gloria did denounce Clinton's activities with Monica, but being a loyal democrat, she stopped waaaaaay short of voicing her support for impeachment because "lying about sex didn't merit impeachment."Then her disapproval is null and void.
I was listening to her during impeachment, and she barely mentioned Monica once, and then moved right on.
28
posted on
08/29/2003 10:55:15 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: RLK
Did she object to such things in Bill Clinton? Uhhhh.... yes she did. She called for his impeachment and removal from office repeatedly on her radio show. So bzzzzzzzzzzz. The only hypocrites around here are the "conservatives" who would excuse "gang-banging" a defenseless woman.
29
posted on
08/29/2003 10:55:33 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
To: LdSentinal
We're Slouching Towards Gammorah.
What has happened to the Free Republic?!
This seems to no longer be a conservative forum. It is merely "The Republican Underground"... a hangout for ultra partisan hacks who will excuse anyone who has an "R" next to his name, regardless as to where they stand on the issues.
30
posted on
08/29/2003 10:58:28 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
To: onyx
No we don't. Gloria did denounce Clinton's activities with Monica, but being a loyal democrat, she stopped waaaaaay short of voicing her support for impeachment because "lying about sex didn't merit impeachment."
-----------------------
What about raping Juanita Broaddrick and several other women
31
posted on
08/29/2003 11:00:16 PM PDT
by
RLK
To: Dog Gone
there was a black girl who came out naked Let's see here. A woman comes out naked and alone in front of a group of large body building men.
I know you are not supposed to blame the victim, but if the woman was a policwoman, it would be called entrapment.
Further, if I go into a poor area with a wad of hundred dollar bills in each hand and yelling "I'm rich and your poor", if I get beaten up, I think I deserved it.
32
posted on
08/29/2003 11:01:02 PM PDT
by
staytrue
To: rdb3
One thing that I rarely do is play games. I quoted your words back to you. Could you not have just said "woman" instead of "black woman?" I mean, she's still a woman, right? No... you are playing games. You're trying to play the race card and subtly accuse me of racism because I referred to her as a black woman, when in fact, I was simply referring to her in the same way that your man Ahnold did. But then going back to your circular reasoning, you'll say it doesn't matter how he referred to her, because it was in the "past"... Well guess what, the way I referred to her is now also in the past.
Keep on trolling, I guess...
33
posted on
08/29/2003 11:01:41 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
To: ambrose
Where was Gloria Allred when *BILL CLINTON* was taking advantage of a *BARELY LEGAL* intern? She seemed to take a *VOW OF SILENCE* back then!
But when it comes to a *CONSERVATIVE* like Schwarzenegger, she is *OH* so concerned about an interview from over 30 *YEARS* ago!
The *HYPOCRISY* is pathetic!
To: staytrue
I hope Ahnold goes for the "she deserved it defense".. that will really win him votes with the Sucker Mom crowd that he covets.
35
posted on
08/29/2003 11:02:39 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
To: ambrose
1970's, free sex was just becoming THE thing, women were demanding sexual equality, there is no way of knowing if this really happened or if it was some frenchman's imagination running wild.
Democrats don't seem to understand the difference between what you did 30 years ago as compared to what you are doing now. They seem to think conservatives are so prim that we don't know the difference between a wild past and a wild present.
To: ambrose
"conservatives" who would excuse "gang-banging" a defenseless woman. Defenseless? Are you saying she was raped?
37
posted on
08/29/2003 11:03:30 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: rdb3
"One thing that I rarely do is play games. I quoted your words back to you. Could you not have just said "woman" instead of "black woman?" I mean, she's still a woman, right?"
I see your point. I heard it discussed on the radio, along with the fact the interview used the term "fag" as well.
The jist of the conversation was: Did this constitute "disrespect" by Arnold towards blacks and homosexuals?
He might have as easily said: "...a blonde woman."
Since the whole thing was 26 years ago, and doesn't seem to reveal any expressed prejudice by Arnold, my reading determines it is fairly benign on that issue.
Not so benign, however, is the content about loose sex and drug use. That may not go down well, with a few voters.
How do you feel about the article itself, regarding the "woman" aspect? Do you feel Arnold was disrespectful (way back then)?
To: RLK
What about raping Juanita Broaddrick and several other women?Since I detest Gloria and usually *mute* her as soon as her face appears on my TV screen, I can't answer your question.
39
posted on
08/29/2003 11:04:31 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
To: Mr. Mojo
Are you saying she was raped? I didn't use the term "gang-bang", Ahnold did. Why don't you ask him?
Or would you rather hound McClintock out of the race, and wait for Bob Mulholland to produce the woman with days left in the election?
Think people, think!
I know morality doesn't matter one wit around here anymore, but if all you care about is winning, then you might want to think twice before you put all your apples in this rotten cart.
40
posted on
08/29/2003 11:06:06 PM PDT
by
ambrose
(If You're Not Outraged, You're Not Paying Attention...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 361-362 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson