Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NMC EXP
When everyone has "Rights" then nobody has "Rights." "Rights" exist only inter pares.
6 posted on 08/31/2003 9:54:39 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
When everyone has "Rights" then nobody has "Rights." "Rights" exist only inter pares.

Rights exist only "between peers"?

While in actual practice the ruling aristocracy has more rights than me, is that the way it is supposed to be from Constitutional and moral standpoints?

Regards

J.R.

28 posted on 08/31/2003 4:37:34 PM PDT by NMC EXP (Choose one: [a] party [b] principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson