[jwalsh07]

There are reasonable people on both sides of the argument. Unfortunately, none are in this fight.

Could you point me to the section of the US Constitution that deals with reasonable and unreasonable people.

Here I thought the issues at hand were Constitutional questions.

And who decides who's reasonable and who isn't? You?

[A Broken Glass Republican]

Yes. Me. As long as you vote for me as Lifetime World-Ruling Supreme Being.

[A Broken Glass Republican]

And by the way...Since it's strictly a Constitutional Matter according to you, I can only assume you wouldn't object to a 6 ton statue of the Koran being erected anywhere Muslims would like to place it??

Of course you wouldn't. It's all about Freedom of Religion, isn't it? And not the Christians (Mostly) that founded this wonderful country...

[quidnunc]

Quote:

While Moore and his lawyers argued that the Ten Commandments monument was permitted under the First Amendment, the legal battleground ultimately shifted to a fight over states' rights — to the dismay of some of the judge's supporters.

In large measure, the Civil War was fought to settle the issue of whether the federal government was sovereign over state governments. In the 1950s and 1960s, during the civil rights movement, Alabama and other pro-segregation states in the South raised the same issue — also without success.

The question was settled at Gettysburg and at Appomattox — it's time to stop re-fighting the states'-rights battle.