Skip to comments.
McClintock Key to Democratic Victory in California
Intellectual Conservative.com ^
| 9/2/3
| Bob Chandra
Posted on 09/02/2003 4:21:28 PM PDT by socal_parrot
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 741-760 next last
To: Tempest; BlackElk
"I find it funny that the guy from Tennessee who has a Democrat as governor is trying to lecture the guy from Texas that has a Republican as Governor. What happened Filed Marshall??? Did you guys try to run some true blue conservative in Tennessee that got clobbered?! Now you want to give me a Californian some election advice on which candidate to choose?! LOL!!! Oh my."
You just set yourself up. See, we had a RINO Governor for 8 years who Ah-nold would seek to emulate (especially on expansion of gubmint and his tax happiness), and voila ! the GOP got blamed and painted with the Scumquist broadbrush DESPITE the rank and file being overwhelming opposed to him, exactly what happened with Wilson and what will happen again with your buddy Ah-nold, and we got a nice 'Rat Governor pledging to clean up the "Republican" mess (nope, not Republican, RINO mess). So much for your "winning by incrementalism" theory. All we get with liberal RINOs is more liberal 'Rats to succeed them and move society further left. This is why I care about CA and to warn them not to follow our path (or do an encore performance), or the path followed by RINOs in places like Illinois, New Jersey, or the like... Like I said, you just set yourself up.
641
posted on
09/02/2003 9:58:22 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: Cultural Jihad
Hardly CJ, it just elicits Mr. Robinson's opinion on the matter along with a couple of communist quotes.
The slouch toward Gommorah [sp?] will continue with Arnold (I'll bet a $20.00 donation above my tithe to that) at the helm AND we'll get tarred and feathered with the fallout for not fixing the state.
What if Arnold is elected and the financial picture improves some, but we still get doofy stuff like licenses for illegals, more evironmental whackoism and moral decline? Are we to celebrate that?
642
posted on
09/02/2003 9:58:37 PM PDT
by
Axenolith
(And you don't want to stand below where the cows roost... :))
To: TatieBug
"Exactly right. We all think McClintock would do a fantastic job as Governor"
Then stop the insanity, back away from the RINO and VOTE for him ! Why do you want a creep Socialist running as the GOP standard-bearer ? Why do you say McClintock can't win when he received more votes than ANY other Republican last year ? This is crazy !
643
posted on
09/02/2003 10:01:29 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: Axenolith
So much easier to not have our guys take responsibility for anything, don't you think? Let the Democrats take the hits for all the problems in the world - as they run it.
I'll take my chances, just as I did voting for George W. when people were saying the Presidency wasn't worth winning back in 2000 because of all the economic troubles in the world.
To: Torie
Thanks, Torie. I believe there is room enough in this world for honorable people to have honest disagreements.
But even brothers sometimes give each other bloody noses.
;-)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Just wanted to thank you for your performance tonight, you and your fellow McClintock supporters have done a lot of good for Arnold. Appreciate it. :)
To: FairOpinion
Why would a Conservative, ANY Conservative, want to vote for a leftist creep like Ah-nold ?
647
posted on
09/02/2003 10:11:06 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: Cultural Jihad
Don't get so high and mighty, dude.
648
posted on
09/02/2003 10:12:08 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: Axenolith
Such sins against hope. If we are to just sit on our hands or wring them over the travails and burdens not even apparent, what would be the point? True, there are important fights ahead, and that is why I want to have a fighter in the ring, not some lightweight or one who skulks and walks away.
To: LdSentinal
...And another thing about that Trent Lott... ;-)
650
posted on
09/02/2003 10:14:00 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: LdSentinal
Arnold and Bustamante are very close, it's going to be a finish "by a nose".
There is a lot at stake, like the life of California.
Every vote will be very important.
I would urge everyone to really think about their vote.
A vote for Arnold will be a vote for Republicans, because Arnold is getting a lot of support from the Republicans, who will help him turn California around.
A vote for McClintock is indeed a vote for Bustamante, this is NOT an opinion poll, to show that there are conservatives in California, this is a winner take all, and considering that McClintock has ZERO chance of winning, voting for him IS a vote for Bustamante, as we keep saying repeatedly, which was also Haynes's point.
Arnold would be better than any Democrat, but Bustamante is not only a Democrat, but he is in favor of specific actions which lead to the destruction of California so far, and he wants to accelerate this destruction by loosening things for illegal aliens, raising taxes, burdening business, regulating oil and this is just for start. And don't forget that he also refused to dissociate himself from MeCHA.
So the stakes are really high.
Which also means that the Dems will resort to dirty tricks we didn't know exist, and if we want a chance of winning, we need to unite behind one person and because of the situation and circumstances that person is Arnold.
To: B Knotts
Bingo.
652
posted on
09/02/2003 10:14:51 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: Axenolith
They'll celebrate it, and how ! The funny thing is, as much as I'm against the creep, I'll admit that I believe he might bring back some businesses to CA in the VERY short run (some thinking he'll be Mr. Wunnaful with the economy), but it's to fund his Socialist utopia (more black hole spending on the schools (read: teacher labor unions) and full scale subsidy of day care (read: who needs parents). As soon as the businesses get wise to it (and the taxes go up as they'll have to), they'll resume their flight once more, and then some... Upton Sinclair rises from the dead !
653
posted on
09/02/2003 10:19:48 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: KellyAdmirer
You're a strange bird. Where did anyone say the Presidency wasn't worth winning in 2000 ?
655
posted on
09/02/2003 10:21:37 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: fieldmarshaldj
You're calling me strange! LOL!! I have to admit, you are one entertaining person. Aren't your fingers a bit tired by now?
To: KellyAdmirer
"Just wanted to thank you for your performance tonight"
Thanks. Just here to enlighten "the people" on Ah-nold and his wunnaful leftist agenda for California. :-)
657
posted on
09/02/2003 10:24:32 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: socal_parrot
For starters, Democrats know McClintock cannot win.
Ouch!
They know that he has ran for statewide office twice before and lost both times.
You're hurting my feelings!
658
posted on
09/02/2003 10:25:03 PM PDT
by
Penner
To: FairOpinion
"A vote for Arnold will be a vote for Republicans"
Nope, it's a vote for RINOs and a vote to further liberalism, and a vote to guarantee putting a 'Rat in Sacramento come next election time and to further shrink the numbers of the GOP in the legislative and federal offices from CA. The 'Rats WANT people to vote for him as they get to kill 2 birds with one stone, they get their liberalism enacted and they get to destroy the GOP from within. Brilliant strategy. We're not fooled, at least MOST of us are not. McClintock is the ONLY man with a plan to save California, period.
659
posted on
09/02/2003 10:27:53 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~RINOs can eat my shorts - and you don't want to know when I washed 'em last~)
To: ArneFufkin
You'll love hearing one of the McClintock unappeasables in voice. LMAO! It was even funnier the second time! ROFLMAO!
660
posted on
09/02/2003 10:28:06 PM PDT
by
onyx
(Name an honest democrat? I can't either!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 621-640, 641-660, 661-680 ... 741-760 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson