Skip to comments.
The Oui Republican
The American Prowler (Spectator) ^
| September 3, 2003
| George Neumayr
Posted on 09/02/2003 10:05:05 PM PDT by HadEnough
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: Spiff
Did you vote for Pete Wilson? He was/is pro-choice.
There is a lot at stake in this recall.
Here's a thread today on Cruz Bustamante and MEChA.
Race, Californias Final Solution
The Washington Dispatch | 9/3/03 | Patrick Rooney
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/975132/posts For the Race, everything, for those outside the Race, nothing. -Motto of MEChA
To: ElkGroveDan
Hey Dan, use this
He's laughing with you, not at you, cuz he's honest.
22
posted on
09/03/2003 9:39:52 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: montag813
Right right, a vote for Tom is a vote for Bustamante. That's gotten old. Most of your hatred of Tom McClintock has.
Tell me montag813, I'm aweful intrigued, in your political wisdom, considering you post your political opinion on here, would you say that (R)nold will not raise taxes in California? He's anti tax ya know, is that good enough?
I just wanted to know given your knowledge of whether someone is kidding about being a conservative if you could answer that on September 3, 2003. Thanks.
23
posted on
09/03/2003 9:43:44 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Right right, a vote for Tom is a vote for Bustamante. That's gotten old. Most of your hatred of Tom McClintock has. I had nothing but respect for Mr. McClintock before he decided to derail the GOP's chances for victory, and soul his soul to the Indian Cosa Nostra. How is this "hatred"?
And YES, a vote for Tom is a vote for Aztlan. This is beyond question, no matter how "old" you think the concept is.
To: montag813
Nice rant. Now can you answer the only question posed? Thanks.
25
posted on
09/03/2003 9:53:48 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: HadEnough
Unless a Republican is explicitly and philosophically opposed to new taxes he will eventually raise them.
Thats the gods honest.
27
posted on
09/03/2003 10:09:45 AM PDT
by
dead
(Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
To: Keith
>>
having Ahhhhhhnuld win the state house is about getting Cali for Bush in 04 << "Having RINO Whitman win the state house is about getting NJ for Bush in 2000!"
"Having RINO George Ryan win the state house is about getting Ill. for Bush in 2000!"
"Having RINO Ridge win the state house is about getting Penn. for Bush in 2000!"
"Having RINO Pataki win the state house is about getting NY for Bush in 2000!"
"Having RINO Cellucci win the state house is about getting Mass. for Bush in 2000!"
"Having RINO Rowland win the state house is about getting CT for Bush in 2000!"
"Having RINO Linc Almond win the state house is about getting RI for Bush in 2000!"
28
posted on
09/03/2003 10:13:21 AM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(George Ryan deserves a long term....without parole.)
To: montag813
I had nothing but respect for Mr. McClintock before he decided to derail the GOP's chances for victory, Tom announced his candidacy long before the movie star did. He had a plan to fix California's problems years ago - Arnold doesn't have one yet. It was Arnold that decided to derail the conservative's chances for victory - bought and paid for by the Kennedy clan.
29
posted on
09/03/2003 10:22:54 AM PDT
by
Spiff
(Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: BillyBoy
"Having RINO Whitman win the state house is about getting NJ for Bush in 2000!" "Having RINO George Ryan win the state house is about getting Ill. for Bush in 2000!" "Having RINO Ridge win the state house is about getting Penn. for Bush in 2000!" "Having RINO Pataki win the state house is about getting NY for Bush in 2000!" "Having RINO Cellucci win the state house is about getting Mass. for Bush in 2000!" "Having RINO Rowland win the state house is about getting CT for Bush in 2000!" "Having RINO Linc Almond win the state house is about getting RI for Bush in 2000!" Ahh, so you see the battered-Republican trend too. Glad I'm not the only one.
30
posted on
09/03/2003 10:24:09 AM PDT
by
Spiff
(Have you committed one random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: HadEnough
Dear HadEnough, McC is not now, nor has ever been, nor ever will be a contender in this race, only a spoiler.
Go Arnold
31
posted on
09/03/2003 10:25:48 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: ElkGroveDan
... , and keep em' loaded!Bwahahahahaha.
Go Arnold
32
posted on
09/03/2003 10:29:16 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Sure glad you have the 'effing irrelevant' over the hitchhiker.
33
posted on
09/03/2003 10:31:16 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: 68 grunt
Sure glad you have the 'effing irrelevant' over the hitchhikerHuh? I know you are at least TRYING to refer to this, but what point were you trying to make?
34
posted on
09/03/2003 10:34:49 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: HadEnough
Late Sept. Debate..
Questions given ahead of time to candidates
No questions from audience
No rebuttal time.
Security
Mc
35
posted on
09/03/2003 10:35:28 AM PDT
by
Neenah
To: montag813
And YES, a vote for Tom is a vote for Aztlan. This is beyond question, no matter how "old" you think the concept is.Say montag813, if that were true, why was you post banned?
Still waiting on your answer as to whether (R)nold will raise taxes in the Golden State of California. *taps foot*
36
posted on
09/03/2003 10:39:15 AM PDT
by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: 68 grunt
Arnuld is too afraid to debate....Because he can't pre-screen the questions, he won't debate.
He can only memorize lines fed to him by Pete Wilson & Warren "The Tax Increaser" Buffett, who thinks we CA home owners pay to little taxes. What a joke. Bottom line is that Arnold is too chicken to to debate, and everyone knows the reason why. What leadership..
37
posted on
09/03/2003 10:39:21 AM PDT
by
Pro-Bush
(Awareness is what you know before you know anything else.)
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Except that the bottom three 'vote fors' should be followed by an absolute, like 'elect bustamecha'. But you know that, huh?
38
posted on
09/03/2003 10:40:25 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Pro-Bush
... too afraid ...Bwahahahahaha. Y'all in Sacramento are really gonna luv bustamecha.
Go Arnold
39
posted on
09/03/2003 10:42:41 AM PDT
by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
To: Pro-Bush
He can only memorize lines fed to him by Pete Wilson & Warren "The Tax Increaser" BuffettWellllll, now he has just what he needs ! He will get the questions well ahead of the debate, and all he has to do is memorize the answers. No one can question him on the answer from what I heard.
Mc
40
posted on
09/03/2003 10:46:21 AM PDT
by
Neenah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-150 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson