[JohnGalt]

That's a fair point, but my point was only that while he technically (from a legal stand-point) did not commit treason, or at least was not convicted of it, it does not mean that it would be unreasonable to say he committed treason--much as the Rosenbergs did in the 50s.

[af_vet_1981]

No, the Rosenbergs passed nuclear secrets to our enemies (the Communists). Pollard passed (very important) secrets to our allies. There is a difference, albeit he is as guilty as say, Paul Hill was guilty of murder. No question.