Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Approved Departure of Saudis After Sept. 11, Ex-Aide Says
New York Times ^ | September 4, 2003 | By ERIC LICHTBLAU

Posted on 09/04/2003 12:01:08 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed

WASHINGTON, Sept. 3 — Top White House officials personally approved the evacuation of dozens of influential Saudis, including relatives of Osama bin Laden, from the United States in the days after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks when most flights were still grounded, a former White House adviser said today.

The adviser, Richard Clarke, who ran the White House crisis team after the attacks but has since left the Bush administration, said he agreed to the extraordinary plan because the Federal Bureau of Investigation assured him that the departing Saudis were not linked to terrorism. The White House feared that the Saudis could face "retribution" for the hijackings if they remained in the United States, Mr. Clarke said.

The fact that relatives of Mr. bin Laden and other Saudis had been rushed out of the country became public soon after the Sept. 11 attacks. But questions have lingered about the circumstances of their departure, and Mr. Clarke's statements provided the first acknowledgment that the White House had any direct involvement in the plan and that senior administration officials personally signed off on it.

Mr. Clarke first made his remarks about the plan in an article in Vanity Fair due out Thursday, and he expanded on those remarks today in an interview and in Congressional testimony. The White House said today that it had no comment on Mr. Clarke's statements.

The disclosure came just weeks after the classified part of a Congressional report on the Sept. 11 attacks suggested that Saudi Arabia had financial links to the hijackers, and Mr. Clarke's comments are likely to fuel accusations that the United States has gone soft on the Saudis because of diplomatic concerns.

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, seized on Mr. Clarke's comments to call on the White House to conduct an investigation into the hasty departures of about 140 Saudis from the United States in the days after the attacks.

Mr. Schumer said in an interview that he suspected that some of the Saudis who were allowed to leave, particularly two relatives of Mr. bin Laden who he said had links to terrorist groups themselves, could have shed light on the events of Sept. 11.

"This is just another example of our country coddling the Saudis and giving them special privileges that others would never get," Mr. Schumer said. "It's almost as if we didn't want to find out what links existed."

Saudi officials could not be reached for comment today, but in the past they have denied accusations linking them to the 19 hijackers, 15 of them from Saudi Arabia.

While F.B.I. officials would not discuss details of the case, they said that in the days immediately after Sept. 11 bureau agents interviewed the adult relatives of Mr. bin Laden, members of one of Saudi Arabia's richest families, before the White House cleared them to leave the country. Mr. bin Laden is said to be estranged from his family, and many of his relatives have renounced his campaign against the United States.

"We did everything that needed to be done," said John Iannarelli, a bureau spokesman. "There's nothing to indicate that any of these people had any information that could have assisted us, and no one was accorded any additional courtesies that wouldn't have been accorded anyone else."

But the Vanity Fair investigation quotes Dale Watson, the former head of counterterrorism at the F.B.I., as saying that the departing Saudis "were not subject to serious interviews or interrogations."

Mr. Watson could not be reached for comment today.

The article depicts an elaborate but hurried evacuation carried out within a week of the hijackings in which private planes picked up Saudis from 10 cities. Some aviation and bureau officials said they were upset by the operation because the government had not lifted flight restrictions for the general public, but those officials said they lacked the power to stop the evacuation, the article says.

Mr. Clarke, who left the White House in February, said in an interview that he was driven by concern that the Saudis "would be targeted for retribution" by Americans after the hijackings.

Mr. Clarke said he told the bureau to hold anyone it had suspicions about, and the F.B.I. said it did not hold anyone.

Mr. Schumer said he doubted the thoroughness of a rushed review by the bureau, and in a letter to the White House today he said the Saudis appeared to have gotten "a free pass" despite their possible knowledge about the attacks.

New Sentences Ordered for Somalis RICHMOND, Va., Sept. 3 (AP) — Jail terms for two Somali men linked to the Qaeda network were too light, an appeals court ruled today.

The three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ordered new sentencing for the men, who were convicted of evading financial reporting laws while transferring more than $6 million to the United Arab Emirates.

One of the men, Abdirahman Sheikh-ali Isse, was sentenced last year to 18 months in prison; the other, Abdillah S. Abdi, was sentenced to 10 months. Prosecutors have argued for sentences of three to five years.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fourthcircuit; richmond; saudis; september112001; september12era; somalia; terrortrials
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: Dr. Eckleburg
and what were we going to do with them, send them to gitmo? there would have been no practical way to get information from them, unless we had made the decision to effectively overthrow the saudi regime as part of the war on terror. a little to ambitious a goal to take place on 9/12/2001.
21 posted on 09/04/2003 12:39:11 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
So, Schumer is more anti-House of Saud than the GOP? Ok, that makes sense.
22 posted on 09/04/2003 12:42:52 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Inconceivable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
We'll see Bush as a poodle in the lap of Crown Prince Abdullah in NYT political cartoons, eh?
23 posted on 09/04/2003 12:44:56 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (Inconceivable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Damocles
Why is it the Saudi's keep popping up around this terrorism thing? And why the heck were we so quick about shipping out relatives of Bin Laden.

If I recall at the time (2 yers ago) when it was first reported, the dems didn't make a big deal about it

IMO .. this 2 year old story is way by Hellary to divert attention from this book


24 posted on 09/04/2003 12:46:30 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
This is an old story. We all knew this happened shortly after 9-11. What's the big deal now??
25 posted on 09/04/2003 12:51:26 PM PDT by A Broken Glass Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Dr. Eckleburg
You really think the FBI/CIA/Bush didn't know the location of every mercury filling in the mouths of each Saudi on that plane?

The same FBI that ignored multiple warnings from flight instructors concerning Arabs training to fly but not land?

The same CIA that was surprised to learn the Saudi's purchased WMD's for Pakistan?

Do you still believe in Santa?

27 posted on 09/04/2003 12:54:46 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
Yes it is real. It was widely reported soon after the 911 attack by Michael Ruppert and others who have chronicled the exact time line of the events of that day. Do you remember the AF General who was on the news (very briefly) stating that the orders to "stand down" came from the office of "highest accord". He's probably reading weather maps at the south pole now.

Our jets were told to sit on the runways and burn fuel for 40 minutes, while this was going down.
28 posted on 09/04/2003 12:56:03 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
No, not the same FBI and CIA.

And I do believe in Santa Claus.

29 posted on 09/04/2003 12:56:31 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
The Sauduction of Washington



http://www.sauduction.com



30 posted on 09/04/2003 12:57:31 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
It ju8st seems a little odd that the only two aircraft allowed to fly during the 24 hours immediately after the attack were air Force One, and a private jet owned by a Saudi family.



Things that make you go HHMMMMMMMMMMMMM.
31 posted on 09/04/2003 12:58:32 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A Broken Glass Republican
This is an old story. We all knew this happened shortly after 9-11. What's the big deal now??

The Democrats are running out of ideas. They've been going back in time to try to dig up something, anything, they think they can spin against Bush. Notice "The air was bad in NY! What did he know?" crap Hillary has pulled out in the last week?
It's desperation.They must be a lot worse off then we think. No one pays any attention to them anymore.
FOX reported 2 out of 3 can't even name a Democrat presidential contender!

32 posted on 09/04/2003 1:01:21 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
Some Bin Laden family members were suspected of having ties to terrorism. One is Abdullah Bin Laden ("ADL") brother of OSAMA, who was affliated with something called the WAMY or the World Assembly of Muslim Youth. They were based in Virginia. The FBI did once investigate ADL. Do we know if he was on the flight out of the country?
33 posted on 09/04/2003 1:02:32 PM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: Beelzebubba
The fact that relatives of Mr. bin Laden and other Saudis had been rushed out of the country became public soon after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Yes, it happened. AND it has been discussed. Vanity Fair dredging it up as if it's new.

Schumer best hope the bin Laden family that lived here had nothing to do with Osama, since they were living here after all the other al Qaeda attacks, too, under you-know-who's watch. One would think they would have been investigated after those acts of terror, right?

35 posted on 09/04/2003 1:05:52 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Broken Glass Republican
PS....

Also, ELF, ALF, and the peacenicks are going friggen nuts. That says something. No one cares what they think, either.

36 posted on 09/04/2003 1:06:26 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Lucifers lefties are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
It ju8st seems a little odd that the only two aircraft allowed to fly during the 24 hours immediately after the attack were air Force One, and a private jet owned by a Saudi family. Things that make you go HHMMMMMMMMMMMMM.

I believe this has been debunked as urban legend.

37 posted on 09/04/2003 1:07:09 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows, I drink my whiskey clear....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: stillcute
True. Saudi Arabia as a whole should not be immune but individual Saudis are not necessarily guilty. I think Saudi Arabia is in the midst of a bubbling civil war. The situation reminds me of the last Czar of Russia. He assured his allies that all was under control until one day he was gone. The United States helped arm the "White" Russians thereafter, but they were defeated by the "Red" Communists. We payed for that failure for over 70 years. We must not make the same error in Saudi Arabia.
38 posted on 09/04/2003 1:07:38 PM PDT by JDGreen123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
Here's more from Byron York from last September 11, 2002 on this topic.

He, too, calls for answers, but is measured in tone.

The bin Ladens’ Great Escape

39 posted on 09/04/2003 1:08:17 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
This is the kind of stuff I think the Democrats are holding close to the vest. When the '04 election comes around, expect a lot of this stuff to pop up.

Well, it WAS public knowledge. Hard to hold that "close to the vest".

But I do agree the media acts like they have the memory of a gnat. I don't for a second believe they do. They just willfully pretend this is "new". But it's not.

40 posted on 09/04/2003 1:10:27 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson