Replies

DoughtyOne wrote:

"I really do think it's time to impeach the Supreme Court en mass and start over. These fools have never read the Constitution."

Justice Department [Bush/Ashcroft] lawyers urged the court to reject the appeal.
``Federal regulation of firearms and assault weapons is based in large part on evidence that the nationwide market for firearms renders purely local prohibitions ineffective,´´ they said.
[Lying thru their teeth]

Impeach just the Court? How bout the
Republocrat legislators & administrations who write/sign the gun 'laws' and then enforce them?

It's time to bite the bullet and admit our whole political system is flawed beyond repair.

``Federal regulation of firearms and assault weapons is based in large part on evidence that the nationwide market for firearms renders purely local prohibitions ineffective,´´ they said. [Lying thru their teeth]

I believe this is called "begging the question" . What does the above have to do with the regulation of interstate commerce?? If the above is accepted as "proof" of interstate commerce, name something that is *not* interstate commerce.

To: DoughtyOne

DoughtyOne wrote:

"I really do think it's time to impeach the Supreme Court en mass and start over. These fools have never read the Constitution."

Justice Department [Bush/Ashcroft] lawyers urged the court to reject the appeal.
``Federal regulation of firearms and assault weapons is based in large part on evidence that the nationwide market for firearms renders purely local prohibitions
ineffective,´´ they said. [Lying thru their teeth]

Impeach just the Court? How bout the Republocrat legislators & administrations who write/sign the gun 'laws' and then enforce them?

It's time to bite the bullet and admit our whole political system is flawed beyond repair.

13 posted on 09/04/2003 6:09 PM PDT by tpaine ( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator!)

To: tpaine

Here's my rebuttal, "".

19 posted on 09/04/2003 6:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne

Here is your post, and my response. I agreed with your comments so there was no need for a rebuttal. I'm sorry that was not as clear as I thought it would be to you. I thought you'd get a chuckle out of it.

No big deal. I have a lot of sympathy for the views you express here. They show frustration with what's going on, and a bit of animosity thrown in for effect.

We have fallen in love with a beautiful woman who has been presented to us as a chaste woman of worth. What we are waking up to is that our nation is for sale to the highest bidder, and as often as possible. It sucks. When the reality hits me, I feel like I'm seventeen years old being dumped all over again by someone who wasn't what I thought she was.

Our nation has been subverted by evil men.

Can I argue that point about our political system being flawed. I believe that concept sheds bad light on the founders and is untrue. I would be more eager to agree that elected individuals and bureaucrats in government are flawed and have been going along to get along, by bending and shaping government to suit their desires for more than two centuries. The willing masses with their hands out are also part of the problem, not necessarily the political system. As Pogo used to say,...