To: NYer
"According a report in an American magazine"
Beyond sickening if true, in the age of the internet, not providing a link or a source, wreaks of urban legend.
Could you sniff out where this story came from? It would make this thread more powerful.
3 posted on
09/05/2003 11:13:36 AM PDT by
JohnGalt
(Vichycons-- Supporting Endless War Abroad; Appeasing the Welfare State at Home, Since 2001)
To: JohnGalt
I too am skeptical.
These types of people would give the baby no more thought than the piece of gum they scrape off the bottom of their shoe.
5 posted on
09/05/2003 11:15:29 AM PDT by
dead
(Perdicaris alive or Raisuli dead!)
To: JohnGalt
"Could you sniff out where this story came from? It would make this thread more powerful"
I tried a search on Google for something similar to this, and found nothing. I think this story from this website is erroneous, at best. That they did not name the magazine seems to me to be evidence that the story is based on something that does not exist.
7 posted on
09/05/2003 11:19:59 AM PDT by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: JohnGalt
Agreed. Why would they want to do anything like that because that would absolutely destroy their claim that the unborn child was anythiing but ha tiny human being. This story smells like it was written near the cattle pens.
26 posted on
09/05/2003 11:43:35 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson