Does anybody know if this is in the print version?
1 posted on
09/08/2003 2:23:21 PM PDT by
jmstein7
To: jmstein7
See Frank del Olmo's sunday LA Times article on the Op-Ed page.
A real whitewash.
Too disingenuous.
2 posted on
09/08/2003 2:26:42 PM PDT by
tallhappy
To: jmstein7
Any group that is anti American and anti anglo is A OK with the press...academics media and about half the population- imo
The America of our forefathers has been sold down the tubes
3 posted on
09/08/2003 2:32:41 PM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: jmstein7
...certainly racialist, if not racist Oh, there are fine distinctions to be drawn are there? At least when Democrats are the perps.
4 posted on
09/08/2003 2:34:11 PM PDT by
Plutarch
To: jmstein7
Even Democrats hold Republicans to the higher standard.
5 posted on
09/08/2003 2:35:21 PM PDT by
onedoug
To: jmstein7
I like this comment:
As if the Nazi-like call to the power of blood isn't scary enough, Miguel Perez of Cal State-Northridge's MEChA raised the issue of ethnic cleansing. Once Aztlan has been taken over, he said, non-Chicanos "would have to be expelled" and opposition groups quashed "because you have to keep the power."
Gee, if they engage in ethnic cleansing, do you think President Hillary Clinton will call for NATO airstrikes on key Aztlan targets?
6 posted on
09/08/2003 2:46:40 PM PDT by
My2Cents
("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
To: jmstein7
Foolish conservative! Don't you know Leftists cannot be racist?
7 posted on
09/08/2003 2:52:01 PM PDT by
pabianice
To: jmstein7
Join Us
Your One Thread To All The California Recall News Threads!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
8 posted on
09/08/2003 2:55:07 PM PDT by
DoctorZIn
To: jmstein7
main·stream
n.
The prevailing current of thought, influence, or activity: You need not accept the nominee's ideology, only be able to locate it in the American mainstream (Charles Krauthammer).
adj.
Representing the prevalent attitudes, values, and practices of a society or group: mainstream morality.
****
I am starting a campaign to reclaim the word "mainstream." The media outlets that are skewed to the left do not represent "the prevalent attitudes, values, and practices of a society."
In this definition, "mainstream" Americans 'R us, and we should start saying so. We have allowed lefties/socialists to control our language for far too long.
We defeat ourselves when we continue to concede that we are somehow fringe and leftists are centered on the political spectrum.
We could say "Big Media" as in "Big Oil."
I also refuse to call non-conservatives 'liberal,' because they have perverted the true meaning of that word. they are the opposite of liberal in their authoritarian (thought control) attitudes.
11 posted on
09/08/2003 4:05:07 PM PDT by
maica
(Land of the Free, because of the Brave.)
To: jmstein7; All
12 posted on
09/08/2003 5:08:26 PM PDT by
backhoe
To: jmstein7
I uncomfortable with the concept of a California governor who is a
Nationalistic
Socalist
Who thinks it's good public policy to determine the national heratige of each citizen {legal or not}
for the purpose of.................
To: jmstein7
We know what "MECHA" has to say. This is going around on the net and should serve as a response to "MECHA":
14 posted on
09/12/2003 3:24:33 AM PDT by
EUPHORIC
(Picture steaming parrot droppings: "this is your mind on liberalism...")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson