Replies

I don't back spoilers who help get Democrats elected.

Do you support the RNC's anti-#187 strategery in California the past nine years, which has resulted in not a single GOP victory in a Presidential, Senatorial, or Gubernatorial election here since #187 won hands down, in 1994?

Right, can't wait to hear all your tough guy stances in the future on immigration when you have been involved in giving Radical Democrat candidates power by throwing your vote away on a ego driven self serving hack.

Time to change that logo to a tiny kitty weening at the nipple of it's mother.

This backing of the unelectable candidate is the most illogical, ignorant, Democrat empowering action I have seen in the last few years.

Don't expect to take a bow over it from most logical people.

I am highly disappointed in you!

If all this were reversed with the numbers I would be screaming for the Arnold people to be gone by now.

This isn't a WHO's Most Conservative game, it's the battle for our state's survival and doing anything to not empower Democrats activists. You and other McClintock followers have failed miserably in keeping Democrats out and are giving passive support by throwing your vote away on an ego driven hack.

McClintock has an obvious hole in his ethics in allowing a Democrat to gain power in the name of his political future.
He has proved himself to be less than common among politicians. He is toast.

What do you think the Republican Party will do with him down the road after this, promote him? He is the Spoiler of 2003.

If Arnold still manages to win, McSpoiler is still dead in the water. Once votes could be made, he has been sabotaging this race for the Democrats.